In science, if you don’t like the data – simply throw it away and blame it on human interference in the climate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
Recent Comments
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- Francis Barnett on 622 billion tons of new ice
- conrad ziefle on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Big Pharma Sales Tool
- gordon vigurs on The Other Side Of The Pond
- arn on The Other Side Of The Pond
- Bob G on Deadliest US Tornado Days
- Bob G on The Other Side Of The Pond
Deniers of the MWP.
But, but, but, treeometers and thermometers correlate!!! ……… except when they don’t.
Boy, if ever a blog title was spot-on….LOL
“Case closed” In their dreams maybe.
I’ve been vindicated, OJ Simpson October 3, 1995
Phil Plait is now openly getting his cues from PR site DeSmogBlog. How telling.
Criminals all.
Or as someone else said …
Crimatologists
He argues that there was nothing interesting about climategate. He’s probably right. In all fields of science the scientists mess with peer-review, adjust data, form back-scratching relationships, and generally make sure that the results go the way they want them to. That’s why they don’t find climategate interesting.
Those of us with somewhat more naive views were quite disappointed to find that all science, astronomy (how do you corrupt astronomy???) is just as bad as climate science.