In science, if you don’t like the data – simply throw it away and blame it on human interference in the climate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
Recent Comments
- arn on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- conrad ziefle on Warming Twice As Fast
- conrad ziefle on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- dm on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Ohio Cyclist on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Robertvd on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- gordon vigurs on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- arn on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Ed on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- conrad ziefle on ChatGPT Research Proposal
Deniers of the MWP.
But, but, but, treeometers and thermometers correlate!!! ……… except when they don’t.
Boy, if ever a blog title was spot-on….LOL
“Case closed” In their dreams maybe.
I’ve been vindicated, OJ Simpson October 3, 1995
Phil Plait is now openly getting his cues from PR site DeSmogBlog. How telling.
Criminals all.
Or as someone else said …
Crimatologists
He argues that there was nothing interesting about climategate. He’s probably right. In all fields of science the scientists mess with peer-review, adjust data, form back-scratching relationships, and generally make sure that the results go the way they want them to. That’s why they don’t find climategate interesting.
Those of us with somewhat more naive views were quite disappointed to find that all science, astronomy (how do you corrupt astronomy???) is just as bad as climate science.