With all these 40 mph wind gusts going on, we may run out of rock names this summer.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
- “Ensure No One Is Above the Law”
- The Best Electric Cars
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Disillusioned on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Gamecock on “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- roaddog on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- arn on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- gordon vigurs on “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- conrad ziefle on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Bob G on “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Bob G on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- Bob G on Holocene Optimum In Alaska
The beauty of this climate arena is that we can see the shortcomings and the successes of the models and the forecasters in real time. This time next week, we will know if there is a hurricane, tropical storm, rain event or just sunny skies in southern Florida.
They don’t claim to be infallible (unlike their associates at GISS) and they include their error estimates as well as their caveats with each prediction (and not just projection) AND they use real-world data.
viz
RADIOSONDE DATA
FROM THE NORTHEASTERN CARIBBEAN STATIONS SHOW SOME UNFAVORABLE
NORTH-NORTHWESTERLY FLOW AT 300 MB JUST BELOW THE UPPER-LEVEL
OUTFLOW LEVEL. MOREOVER…AS NOTED EARLIER…SOME DRY AIR IS
PRESENT JUST TO THE WEST AND NORTHWEST OF EMILY. IN A FEW
DAYS…PERHAPS IN PART DUE TO THESE LARGE-SCALE FACTORS…THE GFS
AND ECMWF MODELS WEAKEN EMILY TO A LOW-LEVEL TROUGH. THE OFFICIAL
INTENSITY FORECAST SHOWS ONLY SLOW STRENGTHENING INTERRUPTED BY THE
INTERACTION WITH HISPANIOLA…BUT NO LONGER BRINGS THE CYCLONE TO
HURRICANE INTENSITY IN THE LATTER PART OF THE FORECAST PERIOD.
They can officially flush Emily down the toilet along with the other four pieces of crap that were earlier named.