Click on the image to see it full size.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- John Francis on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on New Visitech Features
- Jack the Insider on New Visitech Features
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Mike Peinsipp on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
I can not imagine you will get a sane and competent reply.
What’s the slope of the linear trend line?
You should not hold your breath too long waiting for his response.
How can you be so sceptical? It is obvious that his study is based on a perfectly reasonable extrapolation of the linear trend shown by data from 1999 to 2005. The science is settled!