Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
Steven , did you really expect anything else? Those people have repeatably demonstrated they have no moral character or concept of ethics . Show me a liberal with good character and I will be shocked , shocked I say! Hahahahahahahahahaha
Teddy Kennedy.
So there!
And besides, Teddy was a world-class gourmet chef: His waitress sandwich will be remembered as one of the great culinary feats of the 20th Century.
He was a glutton. He wanted his sandwich slathered in Crisco.
Perhaps I am missing your sarcasm. I am sure Mary Jo Kopechne’s family did not like his character.
Isn’t this very reminiscent of the way Graham Spanier (former President of Penn State) appointed a committee for the purpose of white-washing Michael Mann’s record after “climategate”? And now Graham Spanier is exposed by the Freeh report as being willing to ignore clear signs of child molestation by Sandusky. The morality implicit here is beyond appalling.
Gleick and his apologists are a disgrace to science. If a skeptic had engaged in the same unethical acts and was later cleared of any wrongdoing, it would be breaking news.
The Warmists will always close ranks to protect their brother alarmists. No illegal activity is out of bounds as long as it advances the cause. The Pacific Institute is now an accessory to what is clearly a criminal act.
Excellent news. For every time he or his department utters a word, just a little reminder of his past can be used against him and his messge.
I’m trying to understand the headline. The staff of Pacific Institute walked outside briefly, performed a review, then reinstated the boss?
Note to self:
When you desire reinstatement, it helps to be able to pick the people who pick the outside reviewer.