Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
Recent Comments
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- mwhite on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
Shock News : Greenland Glaciers “nearing catastrophe”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Wow. That is terrific. Didn’t this site once have a listing of “100 years of global warming” which was a set of headlines back to the late 1800s all prophecy-ing an ice-free Arctic within the decade – and ALL from the NY Times!? Love to find that again.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/polar-meltdown/
Ah, OK , thanks. That’s even more comprehensive than the list I was thinking of. Excellent resource!
Like I say, the neat gimmick with the list I was thinking was that it was all NYT, and was showing their obsession as much as the “warming.”
An editor’s dream!
Totally lift and plagiarize an article whose copyright has lapsed and run it in tomorrow’s “science” section!!!
Don’t have to worry about attribution, accuracy, or grammar. Or about paying a current present day stringer either!!!
Sooooooooooo, what’s that your saying again? You need to be more specific?