Conspiracy theorists at UWA believe that Phil Jones and RSS are hiding global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
That is exactly why data must be made to perform correctly, it is ever so sneaky.
It was claimed that the 1999-2001 decrease was the result of aerosols; note that there has never been a correction between satellite and ground temperatures for aerosols
I heard something similar but the word only sounded like ‘aerosols’.
hahaha … i got that! … ROFLMAO
Didn’t I read somewhere that his paper is being refered to as the ” loo ” paper ?
Ok that’s funny. Accurate, but funny.
The Hadley data must be taken as the more reliable average, as RSS averages would have to be reflected in insolation averages from a number of sources, and they are not