Conspiracy theorists at UWA believe that Phil Jones and RSS are hiding global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
That is exactly why data must be made to perform correctly, it is ever so sneaky.
It was claimed that the 1999-2001 decrease was the result of aerosols; note that there has never been a correction between satellite and ground temperatures for aerosols
I heard something similar but the word only sounded like ‘aerosols’.
hahaha … i got that! … ROFLMAO
Didn’t I read somewhere that his paper is being refered to as the ” loo ” paper ?
Ok that’s funny. Accurate, but funny.
The Hadley data must be taken as the more reliable average, as RSS averages would have to be reflected in insolation averages from a number of sources, and they are not