Obama says he can stop droughts and floods, but he was unable to stop a 30% probability of rain which convinced him to move his speech indoors. Can someone explain how that works?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924

Obama’s flash-in-the-pan moment is past and none too soon. His worn out Marxist/Stalinist message no longer even moves his followers. You know, intellectual fashions change and his novelty has worn off. Novelty is really all he ever had.
When asked about his policies, Democratic delegates mumble and change the subject to hating on Romney and Ryan.
His big speech was a dud. He is a has-been that never was. Here’s another yawner he gave:
http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/31/obama-speech-to-soldiers-met-with-silence/
“Can someone explain how that works?”
It’s really quite simple. When you have government agencies that will manipulate data, and a sycophantic press corp that will report anything anyway you want them to, you effectively control the weather, the climate, the employment rate……
What that means is they couldn’t find enough suckers willing to be bused in to fill the venue .
Steven- You have an unnecessary apostrophe in the headline. It should read-
Yes We Cant.
This is the 2012 Democrat Election Strategy.
Obama can’t find his inner Immanuel Kant.
That’s the trouble being an empty suit.
There is a 30% chance of rain in Charlotte every day from June thru early September. So why plan an outdoor activity if that is disqualifying?
Nice catch. Not even radio talking heads thought of that.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-obama-lowers-the-bar-on-hope-and-change/2012/09/07/dbf3ea82-f8dc-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_story.html