Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
Three Orders Of Magnitude Off – Close Enough For Government Work
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
If people are going to build many more homes in fire prone areas, you are going to have more destructive fires. Same goes for hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, etc. Does not mean they are getting any worse.
The EPA is the perpetrator here, as usual. They prohibit preventive fires to clear out brush by homeowners, which allows build-up to dangerous levels, or criminalize controlled burns by forestry officials to remove the tinder before a dry season comes. This is sort of like storing cans of gas in your house, and when your house burns down, blaming a slow response of the fire department. Back in the 1800s, there was not a human population and few residents. Now, there is no excuse for such poor ‘housekeeping’ of our forests.
Was she trying to pass remedial math as a student when others were taking statistics? Did she even have statistics as a college student? That would explain why she can’t process data, time after time. So sad.
She is just passing on misinformation from the left wing scum at the Denver Post.
Aren’t scientists supposed to give the information to the press, and not vice versa?
Remember folks, Math is hard, while Arithmetic is easy!
Ya gotta love Heidi’s apologist Andrew Freedman. Within a minute, he produced two tweets, the basic ideas are presented below.
Tweet #1. The Colorado fires don’t tell us much about the climate, and there’s no reason to believe Ms. Cullen was making a point about the climate when she tweeted about them.
Tweet #2. Wildfires are climate and tweeting about them is relevant for a climate related feed.
Of course, many of Mr. Freedman’s fellow travelers cling to the belief that an exceedingly cold spring is the predictable result of global warming.
Heidi Cullen’s history books are very short.
Man, that is one dumb broad.
Heidi Cullen is single-handedly undoing all the gains real women have made in modern society by riding the Bell curve to mediocrity.
Even if we slashed the 1898 damage estimate to $2 an acre in 2013 dollars, the 1898 fire is still far more financially destructive than the 2013 fire.
What is their estimate, 80 cents an acre? Ridiculous