COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
Well that’s only extent, not thickness and weather and then the hole and….. blah blah blah. Let me show you my graphs. Blather Blather Blather.
Brad,
You are almost qualified to be a Climate Chatterbot. All you have to do is sell your soul to the devil and remove half your brain and you too can be a useful idiot to the left.
Working on it. 🙂
May I be so kind to catergize Brad in the mephistophelian syndrome.
Why do they go with 1979-2000 mean value? Why not use mean value to present date?
Totally agree—I don’t understand that, either. Twelve years of data are not included in the mean value, which should lower the mean because of years like 2007 (e.g.).
Doing so would imply that this year’s values could be ABOVE the mean value. Oh, wait. That wouldn’t look good for the warmists, now, would it?
Nature was in perfect equilibrium in 1979 (must have been Jimmy Carter’s influence). Since then ice can only melt, it can no longer freeze. At least that is what the lunatic left believes.
Hey Lou! You are working my side of the street again. 😉
The alarmists need some heavy duty adjusting of the data or maybe even super Reggie and his blow torch.
They are probably picking up the flotilla of alarmist boats.
If you take out the wind in 2012….there’s absolutely nothing to see
Very different numbers here: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html
They have a lot of problems this time of year distinguishing surface melt from open water.
Ok… good point
Ignorance is bliss, especially when trying to make sense out of Arctic ice satellite data.