Arctic Freefall Goes Horizontal

15 Responses to Arctic Freefall Goes Horizontal

1. Brad says:

   July 25, 2013 at 1:49 pm

   Well that’s only extent, not thickness and weather and then the hole and….. blah blah blah. Let me show you my graphs. Blather Blather Blather.

   Reply
   • Glacierman says:

     July 25, 2013 at 1:54 pm

     Brad,

     You are almost qualified to be a Climate Chatterbot. All you have to do is sell your soul to the devil and remove half your brain and you too can be a useful idiot to the left.

     Reply
     • Brad says:

       July 25, 2013 at 2:16 pm

       Working on it. 🙂

       Reply
     • RAVerhoeckx says:

       July 25, 2013 at 2:31 pm

       May I be so kind to catergize Brad in the mephistophelian syndrome.

       Reply
2. Lou says:

   July 25, 2013 at 1:54 pm

   Why do they go with 1979-2000 mean value? Why not use mean value to present date?

   Reply
   • BobW in NC says:

     July 25, 2013 at 2:09 pm

     Totally agree—I don’t understand that, either. Twelve years of data are not included in the mean value, which should lower the mean because of years like 2007 (e.g.).

     Doing so would imply that this year’s values could be ABOVE the mean value. Oh, wait. That wouldn’t look good for the warmists, now, would it?

     Reply
     • Glacierman says:

       July 25, 2013 at 2:13 pm

       Nature was in perfect equilibrium in 1979 (must have been Jimmy Carter’s influence). Since then ice can only melt, it can no longer freeze. At least that is what the lunatic left believes.

       Reply
   • gator69 says:

     July 25, 2013 at 3:41 pm

     Hey Lou! You are working my side of the street again. 😉

     Reply
3. stewart pid says:

   July 25, 2013 at 2:36 pm

   The alarmists need some heavy duty adjusting of the data or maybe even super Reggie and his blow torch.

   Reply
4. gator69 says:

   July 25, 2013 at 3:43 pm

   They are probably picking up the flotilla of alarmist boats.

   Reply
5. Latitude says:

   July 25, 2013 at 3:57 pm

   If you take out the wind in 2012….there’s absolutely nothing to see

   Reply
6. Don Allen says:

   July 25, 2013 at 5:25 pm

   Very different numbers here: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html

   Reply
   • stevengoddard says:

     July 25, 2013 at 5:28 pm

     They have a lot of problems this time of year distinguishing surface melt from open water.

     Reply
     • Don Allen says:

       July 26, 2013 at 12:39 am

       Ok… good point

       Reply
7. Ulises says:

   July 25, 2013 at 11:23 pm

   Ignorance is bliss, especially when trying to make sense out of Arctic ice satellite data.

   Reply