NASA is constantly cooling the past and warming the present – in order to make it appear that Hansen’s theories aren’t the miserable failure which they actually are.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
The new Surtr has spoken. Amen.
I really love this theme “Wrecks our story, Let’s get rid of it”.
This is what characterizes the core of your blog. Staccato type messages like bulets from a machine gun. The “jumping graph’s” leave absolutely no room for any discussion as they represent noting less but “hard forensic evidence” of large scale data manipulation.
IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’t going on.
This is the way to wreck the entire “cult” most effectively.
Please proceed. I look forward to the next “deadly” shot from the hip.
You’re a killer.
“IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’s going on”
Are Climate Alarmists Smarter Than a Six-Year Old!, now that’s an idea for a show.
I can’t even understand how they are allowed to make adjustments to observations. I can see adjustments to estimations but definitely not actual measurements.
The step-functions look like there were fundamental changes in observing, as when the temperatures were taken, or the type of instrument used, or the location of the weather station.
At 1904/1905: you know what was done?
From 1939 – 1947, the change was progressive, as if multiple stations were being converted over time to a new system. You know what the deal was?
I see many stations in the Arctic where the 1930s were adjusted way down in V3.
Dear Internal Revenue Service,
Herein find my revised figures for my past tax liabilities. The fact that they all tilt in my favour is none of your business. Please remit the total amount of overpayment for previous years as soon as possible.