The spectacular failure of their CO2 theory is reason why the criminals at the IPCC have progressively gained confidence up to 95%.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
Jct: Har har har. Temperature going down as CO2 going up!
Yes but if you model it then it all goes the other way, doesn’t avery?
So the models must be correct and the measurements are wrong – isn’t that the way it works avery?
After all the only thing to believe it the information that come out of computerized models and nothing else, eh avery?
For a further proof that CO2 is a coolant over a span not merely for a decade but for thousands of years see FIg. 4 at the latest post at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
which also has a forecast of the timing and extent of the coming cooling
Yet over the years I’ve seen their theory creep into anthropology and other sciences so that we debate dinosaur extinctions caused by CO2 levels in the ancient past, which must also be discredited from BS’sing me when I watch my Science Channel.
Cuttingly good graph. Ouch.
Does CO2 cause global cooling?
If one were to cherry-pick data from only the 21st Century, that would be a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, cherry-picking data from 1979 – 1998 would support the opposite hypothesis.
My considered opinion is that the effect of increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 on global temperature is too small to measure at this stage of the game. The ‘signal’ is swamped out by the noise of natural variation.
A timeless quote from Jennifer Marohasy:
If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.
Steven, you’ve just hit a home run!
Reblogged this on CACA.