The spectacular failure of their CO2 theory is reason why the criminals at the IPCC have progressively gained confidence up to 95%.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Jct: Har har har. Temperature going down as CO2 going up!
Yes but if you model it then it all goes the other way, doesn’t avery?
So the models must be correct and the measurements are wrong – isn’t that the way it works avery?
After all the only thing to believe it the information that come out of computerized models and nothing else, eh avery?
For a further proof that CO2 is a coolant over a span not merely for a decade but for thousands of years see FIg. 4 at the latest post at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
which also has a forecast of the timing and extent of the coming cooling
Yet over the years I’ve seen their theory creep into anthropology and other sciences so that we debate dinosaur extinctions caused by CO2 levels in the ancient past, which must also be discredited from BS’sing me when I watch my Science Channel.
Cuttingly good graph. Ouch.
Does CO2 cause global cooling?
If one were to cherry-pick data from only the 21st Century, that would be a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, cherry-picking data from 1979 – 1998 would support the opposite hypothesis.
My considered opinion is that the effect of increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 on global temperature is too small to measure at this stage of the game. The ‘signal’ is swamped out by the noise of natural variation.
A timeless quote from Jennifer Marohasy:
If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.
Steven, you’ve just hit a home run!
Reblogged this on CACA.