The spectacular failure of their CO2 theory is reason why the criminals at the IPCC have progressively gained confidence up to 95%.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
Recent Comments
- czechlist on “The Hour Of Decision”
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- arn on Technology Advances
- Billyjack on “The Hour Of Decision”
- arn on “fair & equitable”
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “fair & equitable”
- Bob G on Michael Mann Continues His War
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
Jct: Har har har. Temperature going down as CO2 going up!
Yes but if you model it then it all goes the other way, doesn’t avery?
So the models must be correct and the measurements are wrong – isn’t that the way it works avery?
After all the only thing to believe it the information that come out of computerized models and nothing else, eh avery?
For a further proof that CO2 is a coolant over a span not merely for a decade but for thousands of years see FIg. 4 at the latest post at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
which also has a forecast of the timing and extent of the coming cooling
Yet over the years I’ve seen their theory creep into anthropology and other sciences so that we debate dinosaur extinctions caused by CO2 levels in the ancient past, which must also be discredited from BS’sing me when I watch my Science Channel.
Cuttingly good graph. Ouch.
Does CO2 cause global cooling?
If one were to cherry-pick data from only the 21st Century, that would be a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, cherry-picking data from 1979 – 1998 would support the opposite hypothesis.
My considered opinion is that the effect of increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 on global temperature is too small to measure at this stage of the game. The ‘signal’ is swamped out by the noise of natural variation.
A timeless quote from Jennifer Marohasy:
If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.
Steven, you’ve just hit a home run!
Reblogged this on CACA.