The center of the Greenland Ice Sheet has made it above freezing for a total of fifteen minutes over the past three years. Climate experts tell us that it is melting down.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dearieme on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mike Peinsipp on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Mac on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- mwhite on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Denis Rushworth on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- D. Boss on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Yes but those 15 minutes were unprecedented.
And right on schedule for their 150 year recurrence.
‘Unprecedented?’
In what timeline?
And whilst you’re providing that data, please ~do~ provide the reasons for the previous ice losses which are known to have been far greater in scope.
Then too, please indicate how those previous ice-loss periods all happened without Man having been an agent of influence, not having been present.
If Man didn’t cause the prior ice-losses, then what did? And if what caused those prior ice-losses still exists, the how is Man now to blame?
Finally, are we to presume that Man —by his mere existence— has ~more~ affect upon his environment than all other factors combined? If so, just ~how~ would that be?
Please provide incontrovertible scientific proofs!
What part of “Sarcasm” do you not understand?
AGW is the pretext concealing the real agenda of control and diminishment. All for your own good, of course. Even if you can’t see it, they can.
The marvelous thing about Climate change and AGW, is that it provides a target for people like Will and Steven. Thank you guys for making my day.
What is the altitude of this place called “Summit?”
It sits on top of two miles of ice, like most of the surface of Greenland (and Antarctica)
Good onya Steve, keep putting the truth out there
I don’t get it, that chart shows temperatures in the center of Greenland, which is 10,000 ft. above sea level, and surrounded by hundreds of miles of ice. Of course the temperature won’t get above freezing. Temperatures that you have to look at are the ones around the coasts.
Possibly the stupidest comment of the week.
Dear cyobbball:
Al Gore was talking about Greenland melting and raising sea level by 200 feet. That doesn’t happen when the temperatures around the coast go above freezing.
Your humble servant