Do you believe that tampering with data actually causes the climate to change?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Climate Of 1923
- Market Volatility
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- arn on Market Volatility
- arn on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Bill on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Market Volatility
- conrad ziefle on Hottest Summer Ever
- stewartpid on Market Volatility
- William on Record CO2 Growth
- Greg in NZ on Hottest Summer Ever
What data tampering does is change their prospects of keeping long term employment and getting a permanent liplock on the public pension teat.
Fear mongering, data tampering and hysteria creation are simple ways for them to justify wasting taxpayer dollars on their schemes, scams, cons & grifts.
Thank goodness for publicly funded scientists.
Maybe this could be rephrased as : “Do you actually believe that tampering with data causes the climate to change?”
Not only do they change today’s climate — but they change the past as well. Heck, they can even change the future to whatever they say it is. They have become as the gods! Or alternatively, they have become as three year olds.
Perception becomes reality.
Take the stupid Australian Carbon Tax.
It was gonna save the world from CAGW.
12 months later arctic ice extent increases by 50%.
Time to retire it since it worked so well.