This can be clearly seen in the San Francisco Bay, where sea level has risen 0.00 mm over the last 70 years.
Data and Station Information for ALAMEDA (NAVAL AIR STATION)
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
Recent Comments
- czechlist on “The Hour Of Decision”
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Trevor on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- arn on Technology Advances
- Billyjack on “The Hour Of Decision”
- arn on “fair & equitable”
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “fair & equitable”
- Bob G on Michael Mann Continues His War
- arn on Michael Mann Continues His War
Interesting to see that your graphs from Spiegel were sourced from NOAA. The graphs “appear” to say no sea level rise, but NOAA certainly doesn’t deny sea level rise.
It is a graph, it shows what it shows. If you wish to talk about global SLR, there are plenty of posts to talk about that. One to three mm per year, before error bars, is what most peer reviewed lit shows, with zero acceleration.
NOAA thinks sea level rise is something to be concerned about and would probably find fault in the way you are cherry picking their data.
Reblogged this on CACA.