Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
Recent Comments
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- dm on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on 70C At Lisbon
- John Francis on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- John Francis on Perfect Correlation
- oeman50 on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
IPCC never looked at the graph. They don’t care about charts that dispute their motive. They only care about creating charts to promote it.
That’s a pretty impressive increase in ice since the minima, putting on the pounds more than me at Christmas. I actually thought it would be flatter than that.
It could reduce ice thickness by spring though. The large extent means snowfall on top of it before things get really cold will insulate it against the cold to some extent so ice thickness is lower than normal. Conversely after 2007 the scientists discovered it put on thickness more than they expected.
Andy
Answer: All of it . They cannot fit it into their World View and so it is of no use to them!