President Obama says that 400 PPM CO2 causes asthma. Had he ever taken a science class, he would have known that humans exhale 40,000 PPM CO2 from their lungs.
CO2 doesn’t cause asthma, but smoking Choom apparently does cause brain damage.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
Recent Comments
- William on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Luigi on Up Is Down
- Tel on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- dm on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- arn on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on The Clock Is Ticking
Reblogged this on wwlee4411 and commented:
Our president.
No point in reblogging bad info. Steve quote is wrong: “President Obama says that 400 PPM CO2 causes asthma.” He didn’t say that. The new rules would also cut other pollution from old coal plants (soot and smog.)
“…Obama said the new rules would cut down on soot and smog, as well as carbon dioxide emissions. That would help thousands of Americans, he said.
“In just the first year that these standards go into effect, up to 100,000 asthma attacks and 2,100 heart attacks will be avoided – and those numbers will go up from there,” he said.
Those things have nothing to do with CO2 and are dealt with using completely different technology., He is intentionally conflating the two issues, which is one of the most disgusting manifestations of his dishonesty.
Steve, if the carbon emissions regs are enacted, the old dirty inefficient coal plants will be the first to be shut down, thus emitting less soot and smog, thus less asthma.
Stark, I made no comment about Obama’s smartness, and we know he is just repeating what his advisors told him,
Whatanidiot; what do the present regs state for soot and other particulate releases?
See, little “b” bob, you state that like NO REGS are in place right now (and I am SO right now prone to addressing you as a lyingsackofshit it is not funny …)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4
Jim, there are more regs coming, not that there weren’t regs before. Some folks here are projecting, and it isn’t me.
http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=7330
“…Transport Rule, the proposed Coal Combustion Residuals rule, the proposed Tailoring Rule (covering greenhouse gas emissions), the Ozone NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards), the forthcoming National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs), and cooling water regulations under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act….
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Coal_plant_retirements
Little “b” bob, do you know what convergence is?
Do you know what convergence has to do with this situation?
Care to hazard even a WAG?
Let me help you out with this … it has to do with where the administration wants ALL these emissions from anything and everything to ‘converge’, and that would be ZERO emission of ANYTHING, including beneficial (for plant life) CO2.
Forget about cost-benefit analysis and acceptable trade-offs in times of economic down-turn (because, no, Virginia, we have had NO recovery from the Obama depression). This administration is as stupid and tone-deaf as you are, and I know you know what I mean …
Hey look! Somebody who believes Obama is smart. Good luck with that, bobmaginnis.
bobmaginnis says:
June 13, 2014 at 4:22 pm
Please state clearly where I said you made a comment about Obama’s smartness.
There is a point to reblog it. Obama may not have used the words, but the language of the law says that he must use the excuse. Ergo the excuse was used. He is clamping down on CO2 – the others are non sequiturs.
I take it English is not your first language?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196488/
Climate Experts confirm that carbon capture/mediation/farming does not have a cost benefit without a carbon tax.
“But experts say the lower price for carbon, after the Carbon Tax is abolished, simply won’t be worth farmers’ efforts.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-13/carbon-farming-doubts/5522170
Pacific (mafia) politicians worried that the carbon gravy train will not start if Australia abolishes the carbon tax. It’s amazing how little old Australia, by repealing a tax, has such an enormous effect on the global scam.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-13/pacific-presidents/5521478
Australia is thumping the table that the ‘climate science’ house of cards is built on. The Pacific politicians know that if they can not shame and guilt Australia back into line, then it will all come tumbling down, and their easy money from the UN stops. So they have a vested interest to protect, as does the UN.
On Australia’s side is that if you want to play rough you have lots of natural resourses to effectively do it with.
Here’s an interesting thing. My middle son suffered very severe childhood asthma, and ended up in intensive care several times. I wonder how CO2 can explain the fact that we were in hospital with him in May (watched four consecutive FA Cup Finals in Derby Children’s Hospital) and September admission dates 18th,19th,18th,18th and rarely at other times although there were many visits to the GP in between.
Fortunately he’s in his 30s and OK now.
A recent study confirmed that smoking pot as an adolescent can retard development of the brain. In Skeeter’s case, I believe there was existing brain damage that he only intensified with his youthful indiscretions.
I also think that early use like that can ‘lock in’ other mental health states that the individual might otherwise work through in time, like his persistent case of narcissism …
.
Don’t forget Skeeter’s Mommy.
FAS (fetal alcohol syndrome) comes immediately to mind.
**Signs and Symptoms** Characteristics of this syndrome include:
– low birth weight, small head circumference, organ dysfunction
– failure to thrive, developmental delay
-facial abnormalities, including smaller eye openings, flattened cheekbones, and indistinct philtrum (an underdeveloped groove between the nose and the upper lip)
-epilepsy
–poor coordination/fine motor skills
–poor socialization skills, such as difficulty building and maintaining friendships and -relating to groups
–lack of imagination or curiosity
-learning difficulties, including poor memory, inability to understand concepts such as time and money, poor language comprehension, poor problem-solving skills
-behavioral problems, including hyperactivity, inability to concentrate, social withdrawal, stubbornness, impulsiveness, and anxiety
– – – – –
Conclusion, Obama meets the criteria in 7 out of 9 categories that I can tell.
.
I have a CO2 meter in my room, just for fun. It’s usually around 2000 ppm in the morning when I wake up. With one window open it’s around 1200. It’s been up to 4200 ppm depending on who is here. Nobody ever gets asthma or had a heart attack.
My CO2 meter right now says it’s 435.
I purchased mine from co2meter.com.
Do you have a promo code I can use?
With 2 windows open mine also says in the lower 400’s. I’m talking about with the windows closed (winter, night, etc).
Mine is the Extech CO200
Looks exactly like mine, Morgan, just a different name.
I don’t have a code, Jim. But it was $100 cheaper than Amazon.
Great! That will make a nice addition next to the GMC300e (pocket-sized Geiger Counter and Radiation monitor) I picked up about a year ago, just to keep ‘tabs’ on things:
http://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/comersus/store/comersus_viewItem.asp?idProduct=4570
.
The picture would have sufficed for validation of the title.
While not related to Choom in any way, it is surprising how competent and composed Hillary looks in this video from early in 1992. This is actually a ‘roast’ of Ron Brown, DNC Chairman at the time.
Also note the intro by Larry King is pretty edge stuff.
Judging from how Hillary looks these days, I’d say the last 22 years has really taken a toll on her in several ways.
“Hillary Rodham Clinton: Stand-Up Comedy (1992)”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkBpDoNplUI
.
Hillary’s looking more and more nutty all the time. Lol on that one. I hope she’s the nominee. But it probably won’t happen. Because two groups don’t like here. The left, and those that like a little bit of charisma or excitement in their candidates. We should see her steadily deflate over the next couple of years.