All US warming over the last 90 years is the result of data tampering by US government employees. The thermometer data USHCN uses shows that the US warmer in the 1930s, but they alter the data to create the appearance of warming.
Final : ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52i.tar.gz
Raw : ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz
In order to create the appearance of warming, NOAA does a hockey stick of data tampering – which implies that temperature recording methods are getting worse over time.
It’s worse than we thought!
CHAOS and TERROR in August 1945 convinced world leaders to take totalitarian control of mankind.
http://theinternetpost.net/2014/05/31/the-sun-is-not-what-we-we-have-been-told-eric-dollard-reveals-3-secrets-about-the-sun/
They are not at fault for being driven by the survival instinct to deceive the public in order to save themselves from nuclear annihilation.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
Perfectly in line with ‘hope and change’.
‘Transforming America’s temperature records because can they do it –
yes they can!
Our government loves hockey!
http://1y4o79syc6g4difua2cvof9qco.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/fredgraph-money-base-april30-2012.png
Are the raw data and adjusted data available on a USHCN website? It’s stunning that academics are so quiet on this. THIS is what skeptics should be blasting to the world: the continual tampering in the name of sciency-sounding assumptions.
We have been for years. Visit WUWT and look at the archives.
Heck here is the link and the surface station paper link
Or Chiefio (E.M. Smith) link
Or Jo Nova global link
and Australian link
or Digging in the Clay (Verity) link and Verity has many important arcticles around the same time as this article on The ‘Station drop out’ problem
Thanks, Gail. I’ve seen a lot of this, and I appreciate the blogs. I just meant, really, that we should blast it into the mainstream news whenever possible. I read this on blogs, but I never see it in the news, even when skeptics are talking on news shows.
You will never see it in the news because the MSM is paid to spread propaganda for the elite and not to inform the Sheeple. Only small town independent papers have a hope of going against the tide although Breitbart seems to be and a few others like the WSJ and The Daily Telegraph and the Dailymail and Fox. Of course they are all put down as lying conservative papers.
See the Martin Cohen’s article and my comment: http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/martin-cohen-new-york-times-has-vested-interest-in-climate-alarmism/comment-page-1/#comment-38906
Ammunition for those who trash the conservative papers is who actually OWNS the papers and who sits on the Board of Directors.
Huffington Post is a real winner as I learned when I looked at it some years ago. (Links maybe stale and people changed.)
AOL bought out the Huffington Post.
On the board of directors we have a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a former Director of CIT Group Inc and a former partner at Plainfield Asset Management, who “manages investment capital for high net worth individuals based in the United States and abroad. The chairman is also Chairmen of The Advertising Council Inc. who just won a $[“2,049,078 federal contract from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency for ready campaign support services.”
NICE, we find connections to CFR, Bankers,”High net worth individuals” and Homeland Security. Such wonderful LIBERAL groups. (snicker)
References:
http://corp.aol.com/about-aol/board-directors
http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=9179983&ticker=GOOG:US
http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2011/02/07/aol-buy-huffington-post-million806456/
Nice work on your comment on Cohen’s article!.
NotAGolfer,
I started doing all this research because I could not figure out why the economics (and education) in the USA was getting worse and worse and why every effort to fix it caused more problems.
I finally figured out that was the whole goal.
Those in power don’t even want to hear from Skeptics… many simply don’t believe that some big Gov/Science entity like NOAA would fabricate or alter data… to them its all part of the “science”…
Once data or an Article is stamped with the NOAA seal it receives credibility in the media and they retain their funding. Plenty of smoking guns in the Climategate emails… yet Politicians and the Media were more focused on “the break in” or “theft of email” than what this really was… a big whistleblower story.
Interesting that the 0 point on the adjustments graph is about 2000 (data earlier adjusted down, data later adjusted up). The cumulative earliest downwards adjustments are about 3X the total upwards ones.