After Sandy hit, Trenberth announced that global warming had caused the water to warm off the coast of New Jersey, forming a small warm spot in the midst of very cold water.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 yearsâ
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earthâs hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
Recent Comments
- dm on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- arn on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on The Clock Is Ticking
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- Mike Peinsipp on The Clock Is Ticking
Did Trenberth ever hear of the Gulf Stream?
Now, that’s pretty cool (er, hot). CO2 can not only bypass physical laws and teleconnect to the ocean deep but it can also focus like a laser on a patch of water to turn hurricanes into tropical storms before making landfall. CO2 has so many magical properties đ
Looks like this current hurricane could be another bust with below normal water temperatures across much of the tropical Atlantic.
Trenberth has proven himself with 97% certainty to be an utter fool with his recent rant about how all men are rapists and all women are victims of rape. He’s a complete nut job, one of Jim Hansen muppets.
It’s localized global warming.
Kevin T. is a little man, both in terms of physical stature and intellectual stature. His counter arguments to skeptics are fact-free on the technical issues and intensely ad-hominem on the political side. When he and Judy Curry spoke back-to-back at the World Affairs Conference in Boulder CO in April on matters of climate change, the contrast between her technical arguments and his personal attacks could not have been more clear.
It’s no wonder he believes in “heat-hiding-in-the-oceans” where it cannot be measured. That’s the perfect place for fact-free climate “scientists” to take refuge.
Comfy for a while, but it will not last.
Climate Scientists confuse the hell out of me. One minute they say we are gonna have less storms and rainfall
http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Divisions/Marine–Atmospheric-Research/Fewer-rain-storms-across-southern-Australia.aspx
Nek minute they say we are gonna have more and more severe storms??
http://www.ecosmagazine.com/?paper=EC147p26
I met a schizophrenic once………..no I didn’t!!
I don’t know the condition on the east cost but that warm spot it where the Hudson river dumps into the Atlantic, just maybe it is from the spring run off?
The sea surface temperatures for the extratropical portion of Sandy’s storm track shifted DOWN in the 1960s:
http://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/figure-4.png
As a result, from 1938 (the year of the Great New England Hurricane) to 2012 (the year of Sandy), the sea surface temperatures there show a cooling rate of about -0.04 deg C/decade:
http://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/figure-31.png
See the post here:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/october-2012-sea-surface-temperatures-and-anomalies-along-sandys-path-were-not-unusual/
Regards
I ran across this awhile back, its the hot spot:
A NASA satellite confirms that overturning in the North Atlantic Oceanâa process where surface water sinks and deep water rises due to varying water densitiesâspeeds up and slows down by 20 to 30 percent over 12- to 14-year cycles. Scientists previously believed that a change of this magnitude would take hundreds of years, rather than close to a decade…
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=1599