Zeke and Mosher say that my analysis of their method is wrong, because I don’t use their method to analyze the output of their method.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on Perfect Correlation
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Gw on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Disillusioned on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- spren on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- spren on “Earlier Than Usual”
- czechlist on “Earlier Than Usual”
I’m thinking those guys are in need of a 12-step program or intervention; despite repeated, near-constant repetition, I still don’t ‘get their point’. I can read their words, but, their point or the gist of it what they are attempting to convey doesn’t stick … it’s as if it is too, ‘vaporous’, maybe with too many voices and no lead singer or concept to look to.
Simplified: “Where’s then beef”. Some hints, perhaps, for those guys.
o Bullet-point the major concepts
o Run through an example or two
o SLOW DOWN and come down to a practical level
o STOP showing graphs; at this point they are meaningless (to getting ppl to understand their concept and methodology and what their differences in methodology are compared to others.)
I say this as a technical observer.
.
I second.
Am on vacation and have time to read. Where do I find context?
BTW.
Will get to Wyoming tomorrow – where I will resume calling you ft Collin folks “Greenies”
I’m Maryland folk now.
If another method does not reach ones conclusion, you would think Zeke-Mosher might conclude something might be wrong? I am left to assume they were either day dreaming or sleeping in elementary school when there teacher told one way to prove you work is to use a different method to check to see it their original answer is truly correct. Then again maybe they are young enough that that lesson was not taught to them because it might hurt their self esteem.
What the heck would Mosher know about climate ?
I think you should require Zesher-Moke to analyze your process and theirs and show why you are wrong. of course, Mosher won’t, but, Zeke might. The results should be interesting as Zeke explains his assumptions if he takes it on.
You might find the real background of Mr. Mosher interesting:
http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/06/who-is-steven-mosher.html