Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Compassion For Terrorists
The problem is the Ice Core CO2 measurements are a flat out lie since they have values going down as low as 180 ppm.
Translation: If the CO2 levels are below 200 ppm the plant might be able to survive in a semi-dormant state but it isn’t going to have the energy to produce seed.
A more realistic lower limit can be deduced from this field study of wheat (C3).
Other information also shows the New Improved Climastrologist Sanitized Ice Core data is bogus.
TABLE 1
The diffusion of CO2 through ice was determined recently at Scripps Oceanographic Institute.
The diffusion, of course, depends on initial concentration, going from high to low, directly proportional to that concentration. (Fick’s Laws)
If it were very high in ice cores in the past, it would be much lower than that when measured after millenia have passed. The concentration in ice bubbles at Vostok and other places, therefore, has a systematic bias that means high initial concentrations will not be preserved. The concentration inside the air bubble always seeks the outside concentration.
Altogether, the ice samples from cores is an unreliable proxy, the longer the time, the more the measured value will be distorted. So when Climastrologists measure ancient bubbles showing 10,000 ppm, for example, it might have been an order of magnitude higher, depending on the diffusion path distance. (From Bubbagyro an analytical chemist, at WUWT Also see his comment here and here on the games played at Mauna Loa)
Thanks Gail, great post!
OOps sorry Tony, too many links and my last comment got kicked into the WordUnimpressed netherworld.
Leonardo graduated from high school, and nothing more. He makes a living putting on makeup. He does not have a science background yet he is the voice for CAGW. Go figure.
Leonardo is the face of CAGW because Ban Ki-Moon knows certain impressionable people will follow him because he has the status of a cult figure. Not because he can make a convincing argument.
“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”.
Anyone could beat De Caprio in a debate on CAGW. We all need to challenge him, and others like him, to debates. Start confronting these wags with tough questions. Let them bury themselves in their own ignorance in front of the people who adore and follow without question.
He’s not a scientist but he played one in a movie…wait a minute, he hasn’t even done that. He’s played annoying spoiled brats, thief, ne’er-do-well, a king, poet and a bunch of others, including a foul-mouthed liar/cheat/thief/Wall Street slimeball.
Lenny is a lousy actor and a lousy spokesman.
I think he’s a great actor; too bad he makes a total hypocritical ass of himself in the real world.
I take it we have differing opinions of Titanic?
Leonardo Di Caprio (actor) says:
“We are at a pivotal turning point. We are seeing the effects of rapid climate change happening every week on the news.”
So in his eyes, all weather is “climate change”.
It shows how effective the climate change propaganda machine has been.
I despair!
I don’t think it shows that. Leonardo Di Caprio will say stupid things in the complete absence of any propaganda. He’s a natural.
It’s what he does for a living. He:
Parrots the words of someone else
while pretending to be someone else
who has skills he doesn’t have
in a place that doesn’t exist
to tell a story that isn’t true…
and gets paid millions to do it.
The kicker is that he normally gets to do it for 30 seconds to a minute, a “take” at a time, over and over again, until he gets that little bit right and then he does the next bit. Then an entire army of technically ‘ept (but much lower paid) individuals with real skills put all the bits back together in an order that makes Leo look good and follows a story that sells tickets and advertising slots.
He’s perfect for this kind of cr*p ’cause he doesn’t use his brain.
….one thing to consider….from a purely public relations perspective…if these people have to fall back on the “leadership” of a Hollywood Actor….what must the real science be like? If they have fallen to the point where over 1000 scientists have called the whole thing bunkum…and no one believes the other bought-n-paid-for science sluts….the best they can offer up is Leonardo Di Caprio? That is a wild admission on their part…eh?
RJ O’Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves – The Life of an Insane Family
This chart just shows humans have nothing to do with the cycle.
It’s going to get cold. Real cold. Real soon. Looks like any day now.
If only the global warming alarmists were right! As usual, they lie and tell us the exact opposite of what the truth is. Look at the names of various legislation — always opposites. My favorite, the Help America Vote Act!
Why do the people take a boofhead or a bimbo in line with retarded monkeys. As experts on science or even anything else??
After the second or third harsh winter in both Hemispheres on the trot, just about the time of the next US elections, the writing on the wall regarding the ponzy scheme called carbon credits will be visible for all to see.
At the moment there is money in “them thar” gases for both destitute, fraudulent bankers and climate charlatans in academia, eventually the money men will ask for results and they wont be forth coming.
The climate charlatans already know that when the solar minimum concludes, temperatures will return to more normal values, but from a very low base.
When I look at that graph, the first thing I can think of is, What can we do to prevent the coming ice age?
Drive an SUV, and drive it often. We need to double Co2 to 800 ppm, and then 1600, to add 2 degrees. That might be enough, but we’ve got a lot of driving to do.