In order to achieve the requirements of global warming theory, NCDC simply makes up fake data to make it appear that the US is warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
In looking at your finale vs. average USHCN chart I find the base anomaly period of 1951 to 1980 the most interesting. One would assume that the GISS global mean anomaly base never changes, as it is based on the SAME past, 1951 to 1980 period.
Now if the past anomaly basis, 1951 to 1980, is being changed, ( and they do continue to retroactively change the past, including this period) then current maps may be based against a different anomaly, even if it is the same period. (Indeed, if you were to retroactively cool that past anomaly base period, then new maps based on a different anomaly would appear warmer, relative to a now cooler past.) Which brings up a question… If they are changing the past, does the base anomaly change?
I bring this up because GISS only states that they base the anomaly on this period, but they do not specify which version of that period is being used.
thanks in advance.
Oh, here is your chart of GISS changes (sans the dates of those changes) http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss/
You can see how NCDC has changed the US baseline
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/ncdc-wiping-out-americas-hot-past/
+1 Nice graphical representation of the tampering.
BOTH graphs are great at showing the tampering.
Why these people are not in jail is a real mystery. Speaking of people in Jail….
Seems at least one US Court of Appeals is finally stepping up and stomping on the use of SWAT teams to terrify ordinary citizens.
Federal Appeals Court Ridicules Florida Cops For Using SWAT Team To Check On Barbershop Licenses
The cops tried to claim immunity from prosecution for doing their jobs.
About time. Maybe sanity is starting to reappear – FINALLY!
Yes, I see that, However it does not answer what baseline is used globally by NASA GISS for 2014 maps vs say 1998 maps.
By the end of the century we won’t even be expecting another ice age. With enough adjusting, we can all live in a perpetual summer, ignoring the glacier as it moves across our Arizona homestead.