In order to achieve the requirements of global warming theory, NCDC simply makes up fake data to make it appear that the US is warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Compassion For Terrorists
In looking at your finale vs. average USHCN chart I find the base anomaly period of 1951 to 1980 the most interesting. One would assume that the GISS global mean anomaly base never changes, as it is based on the SAME past, 1951 to 1980 period.
Now if the past anomaly basis, 1951 to 1980, is being changed, ( and they do continue to retroactively change the past, including this period) then current maps may be based against a different anomaly, even if it is the same period. (Indeed, if you were to retroactively cool that past anomaly base period, then new maps based on a different anomaly would appear warmer, relative to a now cooler past.) Which brings up a question… If they are changing the past, does the base anomaly change?
I bring this up because GISS only states that they base the anomaly on this period, but they do not specify which version of that period is being used.
thanks in advance.
Oh, here is your chart of GISS changes (sans the dates of those changes) http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss/
You can see how NCDC has changed the US baseline
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/ncdc-wiping-out-americas-hot-past/
+1 Nice graphical representation of the tampering.
BOTH graphs are great at showing the tampering.
Why these people are not in jail is a real mystery. Speaking of people in Jail….
Seems at least one US Court of Appeals is finally stepping up and stomping on the use of SWAT teams to terrify ordinary citizens.
Federal Appeals Court Ridicules Florida Cops For Using SWAT Team To Check On Barbershop Licenses
The cops tried to claim immunity from prosecution for doing their jobs.
About time. Maybe sanity is starting to reappear – FINALLY!
Yes, I see that, However it does not answer what baseline is used globally by NASA GISS for 2014 maps vs say 1998 maps.
By the end of the century we won’t even be expecting another ice age. With enough adjusting, we can all live in a perpetual summer, ignoring the glacier as it moves across our Arizona homestead.