Katherine Hayhoe is not your ordinary young Earth creationist. Most of her graphs start around 1970. Here is why.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
She was born that year! See? 🙂
Born that year, stuck on stupid!
These claims of recent heavy precipitation events in the US must be very carefully evaluated in terms of “time of observation bias”. During this time frame, the measurements at many stations were moved from late afternoon to early morning.
Since a large percentage of heavy precipitation events are late afternoon thunderstorms, the old time tended to split many of them into two days of lesser precipitation. Now, that’s not so.
Because as the song at the beginning of the 1970s said –
5TH DIMENSION Age Of Aquarius Lyrics
Ya, man you’d gatta be there to dig the fab grooves goin’ down!
Well, there’s a deep pit in 1958 on your graph, and I am amazed that she didn’t fall into it with her attempts to harvest cherries.
Ah, she did:
Curiously, she uses “the risk” of events as the increase, not the events themselves.
The cherry picking includes the National Climate Assessment, of course.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Its not Hayhoe… its …. ho, hum !