Katherine Hayhoe is not your ordinary young Earth creationist. Most of her graphs start around 1970. Here is why.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
- John Francis on Back To The Future
She was born that year! See? 🙂
Born that year, stuck on stupid!
These claims of recent heavy precipitation events in the US must be very carefully evaluated in terms of “time of observation bias”. During this time frame, the measurements at many stations were moved from late afternoon to early morning.
Since a large percentage of heavy precipitation events are late afternoon thunderstorms, the old time tended to split many of them into two days of lesser precipitation. Now, that’s not so.
Because as the song at the beginning of the 1970s said –
5TH DIMENSION Age Of Aquarius Lyrics
Ya, man you’d gatta be there to dig the fab grooves goin’ down!
Well, there’s a deep pit in 1958 on your graph, and I am amazed that she didn’t fall into it with her attempts to harvest cherries.
Ah, she did:
Curiously, she uses “the risk” of events as the increase, not the events themselves.
The cherry picking includes the National Climate Assessment, of course.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Its not Hayhoe… its …. ho, hum !