Katherine Hayhoe is not your ordinary young Earth creationist. Most of her graphs start around 1970. Here is why.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Quadrupled Border Crossings
- “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Hottest Day Ever
- Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Same Weather As Always
- “Climate Change Is Killing People”
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Miami Drowning
- Blocked By Ice
- Will He Be Disappointed?
- Don’t Be A Conspiracy Theorist
- Washington Post Spy Analyst
- Summer Heat And Burn Area
- Climate Heresy
- “I do not want to hear about the 1930s”
- “33 storms”
- Something New In North Dakota
- Survival Of The Planet
- “baseless far-right conspiracy theory”
- The BBC
- Biden Uniting America
- Firearms Safety Rules For Actors
- Science Banned In France
- Global Warming in Nevada
- Saving The Climate With Soy
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- arn on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Bob G on Quadrupled Border Crossings
- Gamecock on Radical Communist Donald Harris
- Luigi on Hottest Day Ever
- Disillusioned on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on Hottest Day Ever
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- Bob G on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
- arn on “Ranked most liberal compared to All Senators”
She was born that year! See? 🙂
Born that year, stuck on stupid!
These claims of recent heavy precipitation events in the US must be very carefully evaluated in terms of “time of observation bias”. During this time frame, the measurements at many stations were moved from late afternoon to early morning.
Since a large percentage of heavy precipitation events are late afternoon thunderstorms, the old time tended to split many of them into two days of lesser precipitation. Now, that’s not so.
Because as the song at the beginning of the 1970s said –
5TH DIMENSION Age Of Aquarius Lyrics
Ya, man you’d gatta be there to dig the fab grooves goin’ down!
Well, there’s a deep pit in 1958 on your graph, and I am amazed that she didn’t fall into it with her attempts to harvest cherries.
Ah, she did:
Curiously, she uses “the risk” of events as the increase, not the events themselves.
The cherry picking includes the National Climate Assessment, of course.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Its not Hayhoe… its …. ho, hum !