I have no interest in BS from either side of the global warming debate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on Perfect Correlation
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Gw on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Disillusioned on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
Since there is no global warming there’s nothing to talk about anyway
BS is a relative term. Who decides what is BS?
The landlord? Property rights, and stuff …
This blog is called Real Science for a reason. If you want junk science, pseudoscience, or science fraud, go to Real Climate and talk to Piltdown Mann, or Skeptical Science and talk to John Crook and Dana Nonsense Teller.
Okay, I get it. You choose piss poor wording in a post talking about clouds at night “heating” the surface (and very specifically at night), I point out in a few ways that “heating” means the temperature actually goes up, which would not happen at NIGHT outside of UHI areas, and instead of admitting the choice of wording in that post was not the best, you go off talking about straw men. If you want to mention retaining the heat of the day in the SPECIFIC POST people are discussing, that’s a whole different story.
As someone who puts considerable time into countering liberal bullshit, you should damn well know by now that words and phrasing matter. Genius Gruber’s inadvertent recent confessions bear that out. Speech codes bear that out also, as nearly all of them are liberal attempts to limit discourse and debate to their advantage.
If you really want to try and ram down skeptics throats a new definition of heating that also means less temperature drop, and also compare the ground at NIGHT with a live human body or other heat producing source in any way shape or form, by all means have at it.
Having read several hundred of your posts I can tell you we’re mostly in agreement on many issues. I can also tell you this line of attack on my posts and those of others who have a different definition of heating, and/or don’t care for the term “greenhouse” because they think it’s mostly part of liberals’ BS strategy, is NOT going to help your cause in any way, shape, or form.