I have no interest in BS from either side of the global warming debate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Since there is no global warming there’s nothing to talk about anyway
BS is a relative term. Who decides what is BS?
The landlord? Property rights, and stuff …
This blog is called Real Science for a reason. If you want junk science, pseudoscience, or science fraud, go to Real Climate and talk to Piltdown Mann, or Skeptical Science and talk to John Crook and Dana Nonsense Teller.
Okay, I get it. You choose piss poor wording in a post talking about clouds at night “heating” the surface (and very specifically at night), I point out in a few ways that “heating” means the temperature actually goes up, which would not happen at NIGHT outside of UHI areas, and instead of admitting the choice of wording in that post was not the best, you go off talking about straw men. If you want to mention retaining the heat of the day in the SPECIFIC POST people are discussing, that’s a whole different story.
As someone who puts considerable time into countering liberal bullshit, you should damn well know by now that words and phrasing matter. Genius Gruber’s inadvertent recent confessions bear that out. Speech codes bear that out also, as nearly all of them are liberal attempts to limit discourse and debate to their advantage.
If you really want to try and ram down skeptics throats a new definition of heating that also means less temperature drop, and also compare the ground at NIGHT with a live human body or other heat producing source in any way shape or form, by all means have at it.
Having read several hundred of your posts I can tell you we’re mostly in agreement on many issues. I can also tell you this line of attack on my posts and those of others who have a different definition of heating, and/or don’t care for the term “greenhouse” because they think it’s mostly part of liberals’ BS strategy, is NOT going to help your cause in any way, shape, or form.