I have no interest in BS from either side of the global warming debate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Since there is no global warming there’s nothing to talk about anyway
BS is a relative term. Who decides what is BS?
The landlord? Property rights, and stuff …
This blog is called Real Science for a reason. If you want junk science, pseudoscience, or science fraud, go to Real Climate and talk to Piltdown Mann, or Skeptical Science and talk to John Crook and Dana Nonsense Teller.
Okay, I get it. You choose piss poor wording in a post talking about clouds at night “heating” the surface (and very specifically at night), I point out in a few ways that “heating” means the temperature actually goes up, which would not happen at NIGHT outside of UHI areas, and instead of admitting the choice of wording in that post was not the best, you go off talking about straw men. If you want to mention retaining the heat of the day in the SPECIFIC POST people are discussing, that’s a whole different story.
As someone who puts considerable time into countering liberal bullshit, you should damn well know by now that words and phrasing matter. Genius Gruber’s inadvertent recent confessions bear that out. Speech codes bear that out also, as nearly all of them are liberal attempts to limit discourse and debate to their advantage.
If you really want to try and ram down skeptics throats a new definition of heating that also means less temperature drop, and also compare the ground at NIGHT with a live human body or other heat producing source in any way shape or form, by all means have at it.
Having read several hundred of your posts I can tell you we’re mostly in agreement on many issues. I can also tell you this line of attack on my posts and those of others who have a different definition of heating, and/or don’t care for the term “greenhouse” because they think it’s mostly part of liberals’ BS strategy, is NOT going to help your cause in any way, shape, or form.