Barack Obama has made his way through life by ignoring experts, and breaking existing paradigms. Had he listened to expert opinions, he wouldn’t be president. He really doesn’t care what anyone else thinks.
Except when it comes to these people, whom he pretends are unassailable masters of the universe. When it comes to science, no one is permitted to question their opinion.
Who would DARE question the brilliance of those 4 Men !!
I wouldn’t but I also admire Goddard’s mastery of Linnaean taxonomy and his focus on structural similarities among the men. Look at the distribution of active hair follicles. He’s got the specimens sorted right.
Well, I looked for the laryngeal prominence and was only sure about 75% of them being male (Isn’t it sexist and homophobic to use that term now?.) The upper right subject has the ventral surfaces of his/her/its neck hidden under a woven fabric covering (I’m sure was produced without using any hydrocarbon based energy or feedstocks) and in the absence of any other physical markers I’d have to have a chromosome check run… which is proving surprisingly difficult to do from a photograph. Maybe the reporters at Rolling Stone or the NYT can provide some tips on how to get facts like that without resorting to research.
That shouldn’t take long. I am certain the commenters on this thread violated the civil rights of these men. The Justice Department will summon the genes and chromosomes of all victims and perpetrators to adjudicate the severity of the criminal violations.
+1
ROFL!!
Ha! What a great way to start this thread!
I thought Gadaffi was dead, it lives! 😆
Mr. Ed called.
He wants his teeth back.
Best laugh I have had today,
“Frau Bleuker”
I remember watching John Stossel on Fox News fairly recently. Stossel had Roy Spencer on to talk about climate change. Gavin Schmidt (sp?) was also present and refused to debate or even discuss climate change with Roy Spencer. That right there says a lot about the alarmists’ confidence in their argument. Smug bastard.
Joseph, I saw that also. Gavin Schmidt refused to even be in the same room with Dr. Spencer. He got up from the table and walked out of the studio right before Spencer walked on.
I believe at least part of his outward smugness is about hiding fear. He knows he cannot argue the science, nor defend his adjustments. I think he is afraid he will eventually be taken down.
IMHO
I agree with you in regards to Gavin. If the alarmists are so confident why don’t they debate skeptics?
Naturally. What would he do if Spencer asked him a question?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V96k4BO2sBw
I suspect Gavin Schmidt would soil his pants if he were put in a situation where he had to actually debate his talking points.
It’s extremely telling Gavin is too much the coward to engage in an actual debate.
You mean Schmidt himself? 😆
I really enjoyed watching Gavin sweat and stutter. It was obvious to me that not even he believed what he was saying, no polygraph was needed to prove he was lying.
Roy Spencer is a PhD and a highly respected scientist. If you read his blog, he is extremely reasonable, with no shrillness and no apparent ax to grind. His big “crime” was to help design the satellite that has shown no warming since 1997. Gavin is a mental midget by comparison, though pretends to be above it all. He knows that Spencer will utterly destroy him in any debate, thus running away from the debate is his one and only strategy.
‘His big “crime” was to help design the satellite that has shown no warming since 1997.
Spencer’s book: “The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the World’s Top Climate Scientists” may have had something to do with it. Truth hurts.
His biggest crime is he believes in God. That cannot be tolerated by the open minded left.
+1
Well, any non Jewish/Christian God is welcomed by tolerant, inclusive left.
As opposed to what?
Ya just got to project religeon in there, eh?
Progressives and idealogues… fascists… don’t want debate here guys… they want CONTROL…
Its that simple….
Thus … we must go around them and influence people directly…
Now THAT was funny.
Sheesh, I meant this to go under Phillipe Jones comment
Their exterior appearance is an expression of the interior confused mess.
+1
At least two of them are quite effeminate.
🙂
Yes, but then, how do you explain the hair loss?
Polar melting.
Estrogen deficiency.
http://www.livestrong.com/article/57054-estrogen-deficiency-hair-loss
I’ve simulated their hair loss on my compUTeR…
97% accurate…
“At least two of them are quite effeminate.”
The other two are women
Are you certain of that?
*****
Maybe Austin Powers was on to something.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgOIEGz7o_s
They may think they are important but just like the rest of us they are just cannon fodder. The only difference is they know too much. The only way to get out of the mafia is horizontal.
who are the two nincompoops at the top? Recognize Gavin and little Mikey.
Steven, your challenge is this: “Can you correct falsehoods faster than the worldwide combined forces of consensus scientists can generate them with public funds?”
AGW is only the last in a long series of fraudulent science claims, going back in time from the present to the end of WWII and the decision to form the UN to save the world from annihilation by hiding the creation of the world.
AGW (made-made global warming)
OSN (oscillating solar neutrinos)
LJID (lost Jupiter isotope data)
NAG (neon alphabet game)
SHE (superheavy element) fission
NSI (nearby supernova) injection
IDG (interstellar dust grains)
B2FH (element synthesis in stars)
ABE (average nuclear binding energy)
SSM (standard solar model) of H-stars
Each day, thousands of physicists spend millions of $$$ at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider to hide this empirical fact:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Supplement.pdf
They are not normal people.
Gavin Schmidt ?@ClimateOfGavin
MT @kirkenglehardt: Experts are better at controlling their political biases than ordinary people via @cult_cognition
Who is the one on the top left? I don’t recognize her.
I mean top right. I always confuse those two.
Stephen Hawking.
Yup, only Steven Goddard has the courage to publish this diverse group of Stalin’s little puppets. The list could be expanded to include several post-1945 winners of Nobel and Crafoord prizes.
http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/kari-marie-norgaard-lunatics-lunatic.html
No, I’m pretty sure that’s Stephen Hawking…
http://cp91279.biography.com/1000509261001/1000509261001_1822878160001_BIO-Biography-30-Innovators-Stephen-Hawking-115957-SF.jpg
Kari Norgaard from Oregon. She wants “deniers” to undergo psychiatric evaluations immediately before being shot, or imprisoned for life.
http://www.infowars.com/climate-change-skepticism-a-sickness-that-must-be-treated-says-professor/
[snip]
Let’s NOT “Leave it to Beaver.”
I hate it when I get snippy! Sure would love to know what causes it.
Now I remember, it was about stopping this…
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/31/article-2123260-126A380B000005DC-570_468x306.jpg
… before it lats eggs!
Some people have no sense of humor.
Now I remember, it was about stopping this…
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/31/article-2123260-126A380B000005DC-570_468x306.jpg
… before it lays eggs!
She’s a sociology and environmental studies prof. What does she know of CCCCCCC . . . (Caucasian caused catastrophic carbon climbing climate change). Do parents really send their little darlings to be indoctrinated by this cretin? (and, they pay for it too!) Good Lord! what is this nation coming too. Maybe Khrushchev was right after all when he said: “We will bury you” which was a bad translation for a turn of phrase that better translates to: “you will be done in by your own proletariate and we will be there when that comes to pass.”
Naomi Oreskes
I remember her by her initials.
Is she the ugly one, or the even uglier one?
She’s the stupider looking one
Sorry, Morgan… that doesn’t help at all !
Still 4 choices.
Well, when you strip away all of the gobbledegook, what you have really, is a professor of propaganda.
referring to Naomi Oreskes I speak of.
The bottom two are obviously Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dumber,
The top two could be the wicked queen and one of the toadstools.
Or maybe the top two are from LOTRs, and orc and Gollum.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/8c/11/df/8c11dfde10b6c42afe22e2e2410bfd5e.jpg
All geniuses compared to the top four. And they contributed far more to society. Though the top 4 can be hilarious they aren’t trying to be and each are border line Psychopaths and liars. The bottom four made people laugh on purpose during a very tough time in American history when many had nothing to be happy about.
We all know who the real stooges are, and who were just actors.
No Gator.. those 4 guys where highly intelligent.
The 4 at the top of the thread…. nope !!
Two wicked witches, two flying monkeys.
The four horse-asses of the Apocalypse?
http://toongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/funny-cartoon-gifs-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse.gif
The climate expert on the bottom left looks like he’s holding a bull’s testicle in his mouth
Rocky Mountain Oysters!
Hey mountain oysters are good!
I know but he doesn’t seem to agree. Unless we’re wrong and he’s holding a sheep’s eyeball or another native delicacy in his mouth …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIGmaNoUsRc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCHpgHhqJBI
I’ll have a cheeseburger, and you can eat whatever, as long as I do not have to watch or participate. 😉
I’m fine with a burger and real cheesecake …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3pYhlC60xQ
What burger?
Talking about mixed signals from the Mad House (former White House) http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/04/12/last-2-years-president-obama-blamed-extreme-cold/
Barry plans to have lotsa fun in Paris at COP21 now that he’s proven his negotiating skills with the Chinese over CO2 and the Iranains getting the Bomb.
God help us.
I would bet good money that Moochelle is making all the hotel arrangements, and will make this all about her. If those two bozos were truly concerned about CAGW, do you really think they would be planning a retirement on a tropical Island in the Pacific?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/25/article-2164246-13C65213000005DC-940_634x342.jpg
Oh sure, snip the egg laying creature, but leave Gus and Bigfoot alone.
😆 priceless!
I laughed while it lasted. I didn’t think it would.
what a freak show
Kari NorGaard putting hers scientific expertise to work.
https://climatecrock.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/stefmikkerri.jpg
rejects from nerd camp. Even too nerdy for the nerds. And Who the hell wears white pleated trowsers in the field? Can anyone say staged photo op?
Just a quick glance at fatboy, and you can see he was dressed for a day at Sea World. Note that the swollen fool is freezing his fat ass off, trying to keep his hands warm in the sleeves of is Lands End sweater, as well as protecting is rapidly diminishing core body temperature. He makes Kari look like a genius, and flat chested too.
“… sleeves of his Lands End sweater…”
Talk about a big fat liar.
The alarmist crowd sure has a lot of *ahem* quite unusual looking folks leading the Guardian lemming contingent. Here’s another one:
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/i/RayPierhumbert.jpg
[That’s Pierre Rayhumbert or something, breaking the law by playing that weird instrument.]
Crap! I thought that was Amanda Smart’s ex-husband.
People can’t remember his name and his picture is more famous than he is.
Looks more like Charlie Manson, playing a blow hard harry reid piano.
Interesting that the one least prepared for cold is the office based researcher who developed the hockey stick. I suppose he was expecting a balmy t-shirt day’s walk in the park.
He belives the bullshit he preaches is Me guess.
‘Tax protest’ suicide seals Capitol
The man shot himself on the west front of the Capitol building in Washington DC just after 1pm yesterday local time. No one else was hurt.
Capitol police chief Kim Dine said the man had a backpack and a rolling suitcase, triggering an hours-long lockdown, and a sign that said something about “social justice“.
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/tax-protest-suicide-seals-capitol-31135631.html
Social justice? Sounds like a progressive to me. Thank God he took himself out first, for a change.
But note how the media calls this a ‘tax protest’, as if it were a Tea Party member. I could be wrong, and if I am I will be more than willing to admit it, unlike Progressives.
But there is more…
The sign carried by the man contained a message about “social justice,” Dine said. A witness, Robert Bishop of Annapolis, Md., said it also said something about taxing the “1%..”
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/04/shots-fired-on-west-front-of-us-capitol-113092.html#ixzz3X8xC3wlR
I’m not familiar with any Tea Party members who are concerned with wealth redistribution, in fact, it goes against their Libertarian leanings.
I’m thinking that we do need more background checks for gun permits. Like voting records.
My neurons worked and reminded me of this…. Just sayin>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8MO7fkZc5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jvp5z4z2biw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAxwr3ygP3s
Top left, that’s a bloke, right?, next right, that’s Sister Wendy, the art expert, Bottom left, who the ***is that? bottom right, wouldn’t buy a used car from this guy.
In the name of diversity, where are the black people in this picture?
DeGrasse, couldn’t make it, he was too busy neiing in front of a Green screen.
3 ugly guys and 1 ugly woman; take you pick … politics is show-time for the ugly, because it ain’t science they’re doing!
If ever their were an excuse for depopulating…
“Now I know why tigers eat their young . . .”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udfhBjR-FtA
Who is the man in the top left pic? Looks angry.
Gaddafi apparently!
You’d be angry, too. They plundered his wardrobe and stole all his hats:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2011/10/gaddafi_1838311c.jpg
😆
https://youtu.be/1DS2wXSKF5k
Can we raise the bar above poking fun at these, admittedly, strange looking people? The most noteworthy thing I can say about them is that the geezer at the top-left doesn’t have any facial hair, which in Climate Science is remarkable indeed. And the other three look like they escaped from a lunative assylum. But please, folks, let’s avoid the silly, almost baseless insults.
David,
You know there is plenty of serious discussion on this blog. You are right that this thread is mostly horsing around but i haven’t laughed so much in quite a while.
Besides, it’s good to put these insulting but harmless comments in context with the list Gator posted below.
These are not decent people of good will.
Please read my comment again. If you still miss the tongue-in-cheek irony, read it again! 😉
This is the thread that keeps on giving! Thanks, David, now I’m laughing at my own gullability. No need to reread your plea again. It is quite clear.
Most readers here know that I am against /sarc tags, even at the risk of occasional misunderstanding. Signaling sarcasm spoils the fun. You did it right and it was hard to miss, anyway.
Colorado, I agree, purveyors of lies and propaganda are not good people, and deserve all the sophomoric ribbing they get. But it looked to me like David, UK’s post was tongue-in-cheek. After all, his post was full of irony, replete with insults of his own…
– Referred to them as “admittedly, strange looking people.”
– Referered to Naomi Oreskes as a geezer with no facial hair.
– Said “the other three look like they escaped from a lunative [sic] assylum [sic]”.
Thank you, Disillusioned! Don’t forget the “*almost* baseless insults”!
Disillusioned, thanks from me, too. Yes, it was clear.
I’m typing with both thumbs over Chinese beef lunch (with a serving of crow).
We don’t need CO2 to create hell on Earth.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/11/welcome-sweden-electronic-money-not-so-funny
“The drive to a cashless society is supported by the UN Capital Development Fund’s Better Than Cash Alliance which aims to accelerate the shift to electronic payments, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, MasterCard and Visa among others. But it’s Sweden that is blazing the trail.”
We are moving toward a brain death Big Brother hell.
Whatever happened to those Vikings?
Christopher Monckton has compiled a list of Climate ‘Nazis’…
2005: Margo Kingston, in Australia’s Daily Briefing, said: “Perhaps there is a case for making climate change denial an offence. It is a crime against humanity, after all.”
2006: Bill McGuire, at University College, London, said: “We have Holocaust deniers; we have climate change deniers. And, to be honest, I don’t think there’s a great deal of difference.”
2006: The Grist.com website called for Nuremberg-style trials for climate skeptics. The article was later retracted.
2006: Heidi Cullen featured Dave Roberts, who said online, “When we’ve finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we’re in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards – some sort of climate Nuremberg.” The remark was not later retracted.
2006: Mark Lynas, a “green” columnist, wrote: “I wonder what sentences judges might hand down at future international criminal tribunals on those who will be partially but directly responsible for millions of deaths from starvation, famine and disease in decades ahead. I put [their climate change denial] in a similar moral category to Holocaust denial – except that this time the Holocaust is yet to come, and we still have time to avoid it. Those who try to ensure we don’t will one day have to answer for their crimes.”
2006: Spiked Online reported that when a correspondent for the American current affairs show 60 Minutes was asked why his various feature programmes on global warming did not include the views of global warming sceptics, he replied: “If I do an interview with Elie Wiesel, am I required as a journalist to find a Holocaust denier?”
2007: Ellen Goodman, in the Boston Globe, said: “Let’s just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers.”
2007: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at global warming skeptics, saying: “This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors.” The penalty for treason is death.
2007: Yvo de Boer, secretary general of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said ignoring the urgency of global warming would be “criminally irresponsible”.
2007: Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, a UN special climate envoy, said: “It’s completely immoral even to question” the UN’s scientific opinion on climate.
2008: Dr James Hansen of NASA demanded that skeptics be “put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature”. The penalty for crimes against humanity is death.
2008: David Suzuki, a Canadian environmentalist, said government leaders skeptical of global warming should be “thrown into jail”.
2008: Alex Lockwood, a British journalism professor, said that writers questioning global warming should be banned.
2009: A writer at Talking Points Memo said global warming “deniers” should be executed or jailed. He later retracted this remark.
2010: James Lovelock, inventor of the “Gaia hypothesis”, told The Guardian: “I have a feeling that climate change may be an issue as severe as a war. It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while.”
2010: Dr. Donald Brown, Professor of “Climate Ethics” at Penn State University, declared that skeptics, who had caused “a 25-year delay in acting to stop climate change”, may be guilty of a “new crime against humanity”. The penalty for crimes against humanity is death.
2010: A video from the “10:10 campaign” showed climate skeptic children being blown up by their teacher in class, and their classmates were spattered with their blood and guts.
2011: An Australian journalist said climate skeptics should be “branded” with cattle-irons to mark them out from the rest of the population.
2011: Another Australian journalist said skeptics should be “gassed”.
2012: Professor Richard Parncutt of the University of Graz, Austria, recommended the death penalty for skeptics. He later withdrew.
2012: Dr. Donald Brown, Professor of “Climate Ethics” at Widener University School of Law, again declared that skeptics may be guilty of a “new crime against humanity”. The penalty for crimes against humanity is death.
2014: Dr Lawrence Torcello, assistant philosophy professor at Rochester Institute of Technology, wrote that people who disagreed with him should be sent to jail.
2014: During a February cold snap, the New York Times ran a cartoon headed “Self-Destructing Sabers for Dispatching Climate-Change Deniers” and showing a climate skeptic being stabbed with an icicle.
2014: The gawker.com website said: “Those denialists should face jail. They should face fines. They should face lawsuits from the classes of people whose lives and livelihoods are most threatened by denialist tactics.”
2014: The host of MSNBC’s The Ed Show promoted Soviet-style re-education for climate skeptic politicians by conducting an on-air poll on the question “Should climate-denying Republicans be forced to take a basic earth science course?”
2015: Katie Herzog at Grist.com on 16 January wrote: “If this planet is to survive the scourge that is humanity, we all have to stop reproducing. Yes, all of us. In that spirit, I propose we … sterilize every human male on his 10th birthday.”
2015: Comment on the webpage of the Brisbane Times about a category 5 cyclone along the Queensland coast on 19/20 February: “These type of weather events could happen further south in future and be more intense with global warming … if anyone has to suffer out of this one I hope it is a climate change denier, if anyone.” Downloaded from http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/cyclone-marcia-live-coverage-20150219-13iuaw.html.
2015: The Australian Capital Territory’s Arts Fund gave $18,793 “to assist with costs of the creative development of a new theatre work, Kill Climate Deniers”.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/punishing_climate_change_deniers.html#ixzz3XCXdxx2U
…we should have war crimes trials for these bastards – some sort of climate Nuremberg.”
Sounds like the perfect treatment for purveyors of fraud, like Mike, Jim and Gavin, et al.
The real criminals, responsible for starving millions…
The WHO also states that malnutrition is by far the biggest contributor to child mortality, present in half of all cases.[2] Undernutrition is a contributory factor in the death of 3.1 million children under five every year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starvation
Bjorn Lomborg did the math, and what we spend on CAGW would feed, shelter and offer basic medical care to all the at risk children on Earth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ds4YcxAXkfQ
Think of all the GHGs that would be released. Is killing of climate deniers sustainable?
Deniers: hypothetical deaths in the future.
Believers: actual deaths in the present.
Pick one.
Has Gavin & Mikey ever been seen in the same room at the same time?
Arent two of them women?