In 1976, the New York Times reported that the Northern Hemisphere had cooled nearly as much since 1945 as it rose in the first part of the century.
The National Academy Of Sciences reported this cooling.
But it didn’t fit the global warming agenda, so NASA has since made almost all of that cooling disappear.
NASA temperature data is propaganda, not science. Skeptics who pretend that NASA temperature data is legitimate, are enabling this scam.
We have been told that if a lie is repeated often enough, it will eventually become the truth.
So if you repeat the truth often enough …
There is little doubt that AGW, SNM (standard Nuclear Model), SSM (Standard Solar Model) and BBC (Big Bang Cosmology) are all scams.
In case the current cooling trend continues, a more important potential scam is the FEAR OF NUCLEAR RADIATION. Galen Winson gives reasons to believe this is The Nuclear Scare Scam (2012)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ejCQrOTE-XA&feature=player_embedded
Reblogged this on Climatism.
It is not being deceived, but undeceived, that makes us miserable.–
Sophie Arnold.
True. On awakening, we realize we were not as smart as we thought we were.
“It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled.” Mark Twain
97% of egg-lovers claim eggs are awesome.
97% of the Flat Earth Society believe the Earth is flat.
97% of the Labour Party believe in Labour.
97% of musicians think that people need music in their lives.
97% of climate scientists believe in anthropogenic global warming.
I think there’s a pattern here.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
George Orwell, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”
Of course, it has been presented in this blog before
But for me, the segment of the inner circle that propagates and completely
warps the temperature record into something recognizable is the worst of
clan.
I did not think Hansen could be surpassed, but Gavin Schmidt has managed to
do so in many detestable ways.
When I saw him refuse to go onstage (in a Fox news TV segment) with Roy Spencer,
a man of integrity, I wanted to pull his lying tongue out. It is characteristic of the AGW gang to
not dare to engage.
He knew he would be outclassed, out relevant data availed, and out knowledged by Spencer.
I only charge Roy Spencer with not having the where with all to remain on TV to challenge Schmidt.
That would have been terrific as well as appropriate.
doggone it Darryl, proof read BEFORE you post.
Second sentence should read ‘something UNrecognizeable is the worst of THE clan’.
There was no doubt that global cooling was a serious phenomenon. Although the threat was eminent, neither the IPCC nor other groups concerned with the global warming issue have ever showed any interest in analyzing the pronounced global cooling. The half century climate change occurred without any implication of the CO2. Then what was the determinant factor? Nothing out of the ordinary happened. Throughout the early 20th century, nature resumed its course. No serious earthquake, tsunami, meteorite fall, sunspots occurred. Industrial plants and combustion machines abundantly released smoke, soot, sulfate, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but, instead of a global warming, the world clime cooled down. The only serious event which took place for three years in European waters and for four years at a global level (since 1942) was the warfare (World War Two). The conduction of a naval war at a global level and the turning and churning of huge sea areas in the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans lead to the inevitable. Climate changed dramatically into a colder one, for four decades, as it is shown here on http://www.1ocean-1climate.com. Oceans and seas which had undergone a strong warming during World War I became now significantly colder. This change lasted half a century.