The November, 1976 issue of National Geographic said that sun drives the climate, and that Iceland had cooled since 1940
The post 1940 cooling in Iceland didn’t fit NASA’s agenda, so three years ago they simply made it disappear.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
It’s no longer the Sun that drives the climate. It’s now politics and money. Like Scientific American, National Geographic jumped on the CAGW band wagon and will not turn away. Those on the National Geographic staff are writers with degrees in English, Photography or Journalism and have no idea of how the scientific principle works. They get their lead from populist culture and not healthy science developed from skepticism.
What a great Find!!
Yet sad, HOW and WHY do they think they can just ‘remove’ the cold data??
Astounding..
Who would have thought that something that is responsible for 99.9% of earth energy
could be the main driving factor for our climate???
I”d rather believe that 0.01% of our atmosphere ,man made co2,drives the climate
as it is 100% plausible that a handful co2 molecules can influence earth-climate far more than trillion tons of pure energy(because tv told me so)
Where do you get your information as to what the data said years ago if it’s been changed? Is there a repository somewhere the public can access?
Version 2 http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data_v2/
Version 3 http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/
Steven, thanks for the references. I looked up my home town, and saw that they have also made similar “adjustments” there, which makes it up front and personal for me. This is also valuable to show to friends, relatives, and representatives.
Reblogged this on Rnm101's Blog.
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/scientists-earth-endangered-by-new-strain-of-fact-resistant-humans?intcid=mod-most-popular
Oh the irony.
Winston Smith, you missed another one.
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/n/1984/book-summary
Insanity drives the Western world. Progressives are insane, and they are driving us off a cliff.