The MWP And LIA Climate Criminals

Twenty five years ago, the IPCC reported a strong Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.

ScreenHunter_9570 Jun. 20 05.24

In 1992, the New York Times reported that the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age were “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”

Lisa J. Graumlich, who examines the ring patterns of foxtail pine trees and western junipers in the Sierra Nevada, has compiled a detailed record of the year-to-year variation in temperature and precipitation over the last thousand years.

She has seen in the North American trees the feathery but unmistakable signatures of the Medieval Warm Period, a era from 1100 to 1375 A.D. when, according to European writers of the time and other sources, the climate was so balmy that wine grapes flourished in Britain and the Vikings farmed the now-frozen expanse of Greenland; and the Little Ice Age, a stretch of abnormally frigid weather lasting roughly from 1450 to 1850.

“We can now see that these were global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations,” she said. “The question is, how did we get those warmer temperatures during pre-industrial times, and what can we learn from those conditions about what is going on today?”

In Unexpected Places, Clues to Ancient and Future Climate – Warming? Tree Rings Say Not Yet – NYTimes.com

Climate criminals  knew that their scam was destroyed by the existence of the MWP and LIA, so they made it disappear 15 years ago, claimed they occurred only in Central England, and invented the hockey stick.

I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. He said, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

– Dr. David Deming

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The MWP And LIA Climate Criminals

  1. sabretoothed says:

    Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich said: “There are examples of species all over the world that are essentially the walking dead.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33209548?ocid=socialflow_facebook

  2. Their ignorance of the past gives them no excuse
    To throw around their denier abuse.

    http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/they-call-me-a-denier/

  3. Stewart Pid says:

    Climate criminals … torturing the data until it yields the desired results since the millennium 😉

  4. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Ahh the famous Hockey Stick the most blatant manipulation except for what is going on now with making the past colder to make the present warming.

  5. AndyG55 says:

    OT…. Saw a great comment on another blog….

    “The concept of Peak Renewables is actually analogous to peak oil.

    Peak oil is caused by a decline in readily-extractable oil reserves.

    Peak renewables is caused by a decline in readily-extractable subsidies.”

  6. spren says:

    They needed to get rid of the MWP. Then they needed to get rid of “that blip in the 1940s.” Then they had to create a blip during the last 18 years to find the missing warming. They can conjure up whatever they need as they need it. Most of them work for the government. Look how it always revises all of its numbers from 3 to 6 months ago for GNP and unemployment. Hey, why can’t the climastrologists go back and “adjust” their numbers when they don’t say what they are supposed to say?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *