Understanding NOAA Temperature Adjustments

Posted on June 6, 2015 by Tony Heller

I was able to reproduce NOAA’s latest temperature adjustments, using the identical technique on satellite dataScreenHunter_2275 Jun. 05 17.57

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Understanding NOAA Temperature Adjustments

  1. omanuel says:
    June 6, 2015 at 2:24 am

    Yes! Obviously the temperature is increasing when the graph is viewed “correctly.”

    Reply
    • Latitude says:
      June 6, 2015 at 3:34 pm

      oh come on….this is good news…

      The found the missing heat…..it was hiding behind an adjustment and not the deep ocean
      …and the adjustment means they haven’t been able to accurately measure temps for the past 20 years

      People should be making fun of them and ragging them out on a rail…..

      Reply
  2. omanuel says:
    June 6, 2015 at 2:41 am

    Thank you, Steven, for having the insight to see, and the courage to label, consensus science as BS.

    I witnessed this deception over my entire scientific career, but I simply could not image that scientists would purposely deceive the public.

    Climategate has been a real eye-opener to the reality of George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

    Reply
    • Lawrence 13 says:
      June 6, 2015 at 9:12 am

      Hear, hear. Steve has been a giant in demolishing the tsunami of spin, bull-shite and standing strong even against those who are sceptics. reminds me of John Daley.

      By the way Tony/Steve (FFS can’t we narrow it down to one name?) the graph is hilarious.

      Reply
  3. inMAGICn says:
    June 6, 2015 at 3:13 am

    Oh great. Riemann climatology.

    Reply
  4. omanuel says:
    June 6, 2015 at 3:32 am

    Now CERN physicists seek their fair share of credit for “advancing science.”

    http://wchildblog.com/2015/06/05/c-e-r-n-the-opening-of-the-abyss/

    Reply
  5. SMS says:
    June 6, 2015 at 4:10 am

    That angle still is not going to get us to Catastrophic warming. If you turn the graph 90 degrees you might have something scary.

    Reply
  6. ossqss says:
    June 6, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Now that is a classic!

    Reply
  7. ossqss says:
    June 6, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Now that is a classic!

    Reply
  8. darrylb says:
    June 6, 2015 at 11:52 am

    Thanks, again we appreciate what is displayed here.

    ***If possible, I have a request –=–, something which you have done in part before

    I would like to see at one location, or a regional set of temperature readings
    (MINNESOTA WOULD BE GREAT, OR SOME PART THEREOF

    where the temperature adjustment from the most current value is plotted on the ordinate
    as a function of dates. perhaps five year intervals

    An example to make sure that I am saying this correctly:——
    . If a temperature graph or reading from say 1936 at some location.is available, then the 1936 point would be the adjustment from that value to the current value.
    That would mean having the data available as it was presented in each of the five years
    or any irregular time interval would be great.

    I would expect to see negative adjustments in the 1930’s and increasing positive adjustments
    in recent years
    Then send a location where one such as me can send a little something to cover your expenses.

    I think the graph I described would be very powerful and useful.

    .
    I

    Reply
  9. richard says:
    June 6, 2015 at 12:50 pm

    never a day when Mr Goddard does not make me chuckle.

    Reply
  10. Robertv says:
    June 6, 2015 at 7:52 pm

    Sea Level same problem

    https://youtu.be/8EMoU8OOsBs

    min 7.28

    Reply
  12. omanuel says:
    June 7, 2015 at 12:49 am

    Steven Goddard has the courage to be a real scientist, like Marie Curie. Joseph Stalin, on the other hand was a real coward, like most bullies.

    “Nothing in life is to be feared.
    It is only to be understood.”
    ~ Marie Curie

    The “1945 Stalinization” of science was based on FEAR of nuclear energy and the ill-fated decision to alter the foundations of physics to hide the source of energy in cores of galaxies, stars, some planets and all atoms heavier than 150 amu (atomic mass units) – NEUTRON REPULSION.

    An intriguing and extremely well-done video response to our report on “The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015?

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Social_Experiment.pdf

    describes this same period of time as “The Long Peace of 1945-2015:”

    http://junkscience.com/2015/05/31/think-of-the-carnage-of-wwii-70-million-dead/

    There is better option for the brave at heart than
    _ a.) Worldwide nuclear war
    _ b.) Tyrannical world rule, &
    _ c.) Nuclear energy paranoia

    “The Nuclear Scare Scam:”

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ejCQrOTE-XA&feature=player_embedded

    That option is ACCEPTANCE of reality: Our fate is determined, not by Stalin nor our other political leaders, but by the pulsar at the core of the Sun that made our elements, birthed the solar system and sustained the origin and evolution of life!

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Introduction.pdf

    Reply
  14. Steve Clough Nature Photography says:
    June 16, 2015 at 2:51 pm

    I could not understand your graph until I turned my iPad 45 degrees counterclockwise.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *