I was able to reproduce NOAA’s latest temperature adjustments, using the identical technique on satellite data
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on Media War On Science
- arn on Progress With Electric Cars
- Eli the Pit Bulldog on The Press Vs. Science
- Eli the Pit Bulldog on The Press Vs. Science
- Eli the Pit Bulldog on Progress With Electric Cars
Archives
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Wow! That “climate science” stuff is tricky! Where else can you find a disaster that is so all encompassing that it can destroy cities, submerge islands, and make the oceans boil — but at the same time it is so slippery and subtle that even after a decade and a half it cannot be detected unless you change the data? CAGW makes witch hunts look reasonable in comparison.
No wonder climate scientists enjoy such high respect!!
Yours is obviously the more cost effective method as well.
Comments working?
Excellent, you’ve framed it perfectly ;-)
ROTFLMAO! Pretty close! maybe we can declare a new variable:
“Degrees of Adjustment”. And always made in positve RH degrees.
What, that appears to be about +30°s of adjustment?
You know, Tony, your chart may be even more accurate than I thought at first. Look at that time period around 2008 where the rising line is not merely upright but actually slants backward to the left. I think that shows how the CAGW crowd go backward in time to, uh, “fix the broken data.”
Sea Level same problem
https://youtu.be/8EMoU8OOsBs
min 7.28
Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner: Meeresspiegelanstieg — Fakt und Fiktion