New Video : “Is The Global Temperature Record Credible?”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to New Video : “Is The Global Temperature Record Credible?”

  1. Andy DC says:

    Excellent video! Keep them coming.

  2. RAH says:

    We need to sic Buzz Aldrin on the GISS Climate scammers:

  3. Goebbels created the art of propaganda.

    Even he would be impressed by the ability of governments in Japan, UK and the USA to coordinate their lies.

  4. Colorado Wellington says:

    Obradovich hit the mother lode.

    In October 2015, an unusual heat wave hit San Diego, where not everyone has air conditioning. Obradovich and his colleague Robyn Migliorini noticed “friends and colleagues in grad school weren’t sleeping well at night — sheets off, tossing and turning in the heat — and as a result people were lethargic and somewhat grumpy,” he said. “It was pretty unpleasant.”

    Spurred on by that experience, Obradovich found no one had studied sleep disruptions as a potential impact of climate change.

  5. Robert B says:

    You are going to be picked because most of the adjustments were between 1880 and 1900 where the error bars are large.
    This is where a comparison between hemispheres is important
    Ocean currents are largely ignored because the warming is supposedly consistent

  6. Philip Shehan says:

    Heller shows global land only data, and then compares it with global land and ocean data, to claim that there is corruption of the data.

    Also Heller quotes temperature changes over time from the data including noise spikes or dips, rather than the underlying trend. So he claims that the rise in global temperature from 1880 to 2001 is 0.5 C.

    By his method, I can claim that the rise in temperature from 1891 to 1998 is 1.3 C.

    Heller then shows a graph from a newspaper cutting from 1974 and claims it is “quite different ” to the Gistemp graph. It is not. This is a low resolution graph and has a different baseline to the Gistemp global temperature graph but the features are essentially the same.

    It must first be noted that the baselines are different. All the newspaper graph temperatures show a positive anomaly, whereas the Gistemp graph anomalies are relative to a a 30 year baseline between 1951 and 1980, so some points on the graph are negative.

    Heller compares the the temperature in 1870 to 1970 in the newspaper graph and then… Well, as the data for the Gistemp graph does not go back to 1870 and the difference between 1870 and 1880 in the newspaper graph is 0.15 C, I don’t see what his point is really, but he claims that the data from 1870 shows no warming, in fact a small amount of cooling from 1870 to 1970.

    Comparing 1880 to 1970 for the graphs where we do have comparable data, the difference is either a drop in temperature or no change for the Gistemp data from 1880 to 1970, depending on whether you want to take the difference between the annual or the five year smoothed line, and a rise of about 0.08 C for the newspaper graph. So any adjustments done to the early less accurate data have in fact reduced the apparent global warming. Not really what alarmists would be aiming for.

    Heller then says that the newspaper graph shows a lot of warming from 1880 to 1940, and a lot of cooling from 1940 to 1970. The rise and fall are about 0.04 and 0.035 C. For the Gistemp graph the rise and fall is 0.35 and 0.35 C. So Hellers claim that the Gistemp graph shows no 1940 to 1970 cooling is wrong.

    I stopped watching the video at that point.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Good, you have NOTHING credible to add to any discussion, anyway.

      GISS has been manically adjusted to help the AGW scam.

      Why are you still supporting this scam?

      What’s in it for you?

      You are a LIAR and a low-level troll.

    • AndyG55 says:

      NASA et al have been rampant at adjustments.

      And you KNOW that, you just like to act like you are dumb. (and a good act it is, for sure)

      Stop trying to defend the indefensible, you make yourself look like even more of a fool than you actually are.

    • AndyG55 says:

      here’s NASA 1987

    • AndyG55 says:

      And now.

      I’m sure this is the sort of thing you condone in science.

      Right Phlop !! How you got your pretend PhD, maybe ???????

      Just adjust the data to say what you want it to say.

      No scientist, you, that is for sure. !!!

    • gator69 says:

      If alarmists were as critical of their own camp’s work, all of us skeptics would be out fishing. LOL

      What a maroon!

      • AndyG55 says:

        Dr Brainless is a well known AGW sewer-rat, banned from several forums as being a lying, deceitful, pestilent brain-washed troll.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *