Author Of The Hockey Stick

After I pointed out the absurdities in Michael Mann’s tweet to Roy Spencer yesterday, he responded by directing people to a fake web site – which is engaged in identity theft and slander.

That site refers to me in the first person, but has nothing to do with me.  And if Mann didn’t have me blocked he would know that I use my real name on YouTube, Twitter and my blog.

Rather than addressing the issues I raised, Mann simply engages in more of the dishonest behavior which has been the basis of his career.

It is against Twitter TOU to attack people you have blocked.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Author Of The Hockey Stick

  1. rah says:

    How “scientific” of Mann. I mean really. I get the impression that Mann suffered the indignities of “kick me”, wedgies, and being locked in lockers when he was in HS. And this little turd leads the alarmist “scientists”

    • Anon says:

      Yeah, I am puzzled at what kind of scientists Michael Mann really is? First he goes after Christy & Spencer for a weather event. Then responds to Tony with a link to a fake website. But still refuses to debate anyone who disagrees with him and goes after all those who challenge his science.

      Up until I saw this, I had believed that Mann’s Hockey Stick was due to ineptitude, but it is starting to become manifest that this guy is capable of anything.

  2. KevinPaul says:

    Mann is an internet joke. By refusing data discovery in the Ball case he has effectively refuted his own hockey stick.
    He’s a sore loser and is reduced to trolling around attacking those who are uncovering climate lies and deceit.
    What he did to Mr Ball was dispicable and reveals what a slimey little twerp he really is.
    Those with half a brain can see right through him.

    • KevinPaul says:

      Respecting Mann’s shallowness, I suspect he is baiting skeptics to hopefully evoke a defamatory response, no doubt due to his kitty running low from costs incurred through his failed libel cases. Kia kaha Tony.

      One of my favourites, e-mail 682 Michael Mann is told by Tim Wigley that his son did a science fair project on tree rings using trees behind NCAR and his findings call into question Mann’s frankenstick interpretation.

      10:03 PM 6/5/2003 -0600, Tom Wigley wrote: Mike, Well put! By chance SB03 [Soon and Baliunas] may have got some of these precip things right, but we don’t want to give them any way to claim credit. Also, stationarity is the key. Let me tell you a story. A few years back, my son Eirik did a tree ring science fair project using trees behind NCAR. He found that widths correlated with both temp and precip. However, temp and precip also correlate. There is much other evidence that it is precip that is the driver, and that the temp/width correlation arises via the temp/precip correlation. Interestingly, the temp correlations are much more ephemeral, so the complexities conspire to make this linkage nonstationary. I have not seen any papers in the literature demonstrating this — but, as you point out Mike, it is a crucial issue. Tom.

    • Robertv says:

      Mann knows he is a fraude. The trouble is he knows too much. We all know what the swamp does with people that know too much but become a liability for their structure. They get suicided.

  3. richard says:

    Hmmm, fraudster, Michael Mann, who lost his 9 year , multi million dollar, court case against Dr Tim Ball.

  4. Jim Hunt says:

    Hardly “identity theft” Tony. That account states right up front that it’s “for fun and parody”.

    Have you no sense of humour?

  5. Tom says:

    Awww Mann! He is such a joke. Consider being blocked as the point that you made it. It’s a good thing!

  6. Aussie says:

    I have found that nearly all warmists rely on personal attacks in place of scientific discussion. Mann is the poster boy for this. The extensive use of the term “denier” is symptomatic of this – but in reality they are merely projecting their own denial of the data. The only way they can argue is to try to smear, or shut down the other party.

    Keep up your great work.

    And yes, Twitter are a complete joke when it comes to their Terms of Use. Anybody left of centre gets a free pass and nothing is done…

  7. Authority, at all times and everywhere, means sloth and degeneration. It is only doubt that creates. It is only the minority that counts. –HL Mencken in “The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche”, 1908

    • KevinPaul says:

      Further festerings of Nietzche and his ‘The Gay Science’ posit; “GOD is dead” is rob, rape, and butcher as many as you wish since there is no justice but your own, and the end of all men is dirt, so blossomed the Socialist State Capitalism, Fascism and elitist cabals that have plagued mankind ever since.

  8. nfw says:

    Of course Mann blocks you, he doesn’t like the truth and facts. A real scientist would follow Dr Feynman’s adages: “If you thought that science was certain – well, that is just an error on your part” and “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”

    Other than calling you a Nazi and/or racist the ad hominem attack is just another way of saying they (Mann et al) have lost the argument.

    We’re all still waiting, along with the BC Supreme Court where Mann instituted legal action against Dr Ball and has “lost” by defying the Court, for his “let’s make the Medieval Warming Period disappear” tree ring data. I wonder why he won’t show it and open it to scientific investigation and provability?

    As for Twitter et al impose their ToC on leftie luvvie “progressives”, good luck for any action from those hypocrites and their non-platforms while they censor and publish.

    • DCA says:


      “Other than calling you a Nazi and/or racist the ad hominem attack is just another way of saying they (Mann et al) have lost the argument.”

      A perfect application of Godwin’s Law:

      “For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.”

  9. Disillusioned says:

    I see Man Boy is working very hard to slander critics that call him out on his BS.

    He deserved being called out for cherry picking a 1970 (starting point) graph as answer to Dr. Spencer’s reply that a century of data show “no warming trend.” His original taunt was baseless [historical data show it has been hotter than that over the past century].

    Posting Climatism Central’s red-hot appearing, cherry picked graphic of less than half a century was no answer to Dr. Spencer’s claim that they have 100 years of data showing no warming trend. Man Boy is either incredibly stupid to respond with that non sequitur or he purposefully, knowingly floated that red herring for his ignorant followers to lap up. It is one or the other.

  10. toorightmate says:

    Mark Steyn is still waiting for Michael the Mann.

  11. anothermaninthemirror says:

    Tony, name calling and this sort of behavior by M. Mann can only be interpreted as your website causing this man (excuse the pun) extreme heartburn and anxiety. From a recent book which is a good read and very explicit on this whole topic, specifically with respect to “Climategate” in 2009;

    “Other scientists were shocked and dismayed at what these emails revealed. This small group of scientists were those who for years had been most influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming and playing a major role in the conclusions of the IPCC. One email which received a lot of notoriety indicates that Michael Mann of Penn State University and others were tampering with data. This email reads, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the last 20 years [i.e. from 1981 onwards] and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
    Balzer, Lynne. The Green New Deal and Climate Change: What You Need to Know . Faraday Science Institute. Kindle Edition.

    Keep up the good work. If we all live a decade or so we shall see this deception exposed for what it is, but expect those “scientists”, eco-warriors, pushers of useless “renewable energy” etcetera to say “Well, if we hadn’t been so forceful in our approach, the Planet would have been in a worst state than is”, …. “Heads we win, tails you loose”.

    Keep the vidio’s, graphs coming and articles coming . Thanks….

    • -B- says:

      Sadly it will probably never be exposed in the mainstream because this CO2 global warming nonsense is to drive the world towards the pieces of progressivism that come from its absorption of technocracy. They are attempting to achieve the energy based currency where everyone gets an allotment per month. That is to ration energy.

      If the underlying “science” is exposed to the masses for the garbage that it is a new horse will be used to the same political ends.

Leave a Reply to richard Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.