Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Climate Cancel Culture
- DaveN on Almost The Size Of London
- Terry Shipman on “The Science”
- Moffin on Climate Cancel Culture
- conrad ziefle on Justin Trudeau Discusses Science
Archives
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Thank-you Tony for more informative videos.
The Global Weirding Of 1934 knocks all the blather about CO2 warming and the alarmists ‘climate crisis’ into a cocked hat.
CO2 levels were about 308 ppm in 1934.
Thank you, Toto, for pulling back the curtain on the fraudulent junk science of CO2-caused extreme weather.
Dear Tony,
After absorbing significant data provided by various sources and personal reflection of what could really be going on around the world on multiple levels, I find the true reasons for climate deception (at the top level, not the Greta level) to be very clear: We are vulnerable.
1) If the globe gets a bit warmer, we would prosper greatly with roughly 10 billion people on the planet, although we are stretching certain food supply segments, however,
2) If a massive solar flair would hit us, we could have some major problems for months or even years. We are expecting one within roughly 30 years, however,
3) If it would get just a little but colder, then we could indeed suffer massive food shortages, especially in the northern hemisphere. The north is where the rich people live and the south has the (potential) arable land. Since we are in a historical cold period and in time glaciers will overtake the north, regardless of CO2, it would appear to be the most probable scenario, which we would start to face maybe within the next 500 years.
It’s twisted, but, in reality our problem to solve is global cooling, not global warming and 10 billion people are potentially way too many to feed under circumstances like that. 10 billion is the number Hans Rosling (see his TED talk) came up with, after the improvement of peoples lives aka removing world poverty factors. I believe many scientists know that fact but just remain silent—surviving.
The political factors of leftists and rightists are certainly interesting but pretty much irrelevant, unless one considers the potential usefulness of humanity under colder conditions. Just like in the movie Schindler’s Liste, skilled workers would have priority.
A capitalist society is massively better when times are good but a communist, militarist, freedom-reducing regime might be seen by some as a better way to go, although I disagree with the premise because it kills creativity.
In conclusion, the mob does what the mob does but one day very difficult decisions may have to be made about who gets what and that’s when things get really bad.
Is that something to post on a climate blog? I don’t think so.
Sincerely,
William