Just when I thought academia and UN agencies couldn’t possibly get any more farcical.
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- MGJ on Latest News From The (USSR) United States Socialist Republics
- Ben Vorlich on COVID Triplespeak
- Gummans Gubbe on Two And A Half Years Into The Krugman Economic Collapse
- gatchaman on Social Justice Based Contact Tracing
- Klaus on New Video : Making Climate Change Illegal
Archives
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
thanks Tony for keeping us all updated;
in the way that the work of single individuals can count for so much, what has now been called “Lancetgate” was largely identified by one determined individual;
https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air
the work showed how the cover (covert) organisation Surgisphere seemed a front for various nefarious souls; likely pharmaceutically based; the MSM don’t want to publicise; at least the Guardian has; what would it take for the NY Times and Washington Post to become outraged and discuss what has happened; it is likely putative vaccine manufacturers and microchip enthusiasts only want their evil ways to dominate;
now it seems the nonsense called the WHO has again changed its mind, and decided to look at HO-chloroquine; after halting all enquiries, on the basis of this shady paper.
in the way that Ferguson had big corporations behind him; and to whose tune he danced; this extraordinary Lancet piece was propelled through without scrutiny: what happened to all that “peer-review” that climate alarmists love to talk about;
Re “adult content model” …. pictures please Tony ;-)
Covid science can’t be so much different from Climate Science
as it serves a globalist agenda,
just another next level Lysenkoism.
Therefore a massive negative selection in terms of “experts” is the logical results.
Unbelievable. And the potential is much worse in medicine, because they are at the same time performing unsafe experiments in labs around the world. Many have heard of Plum island where the USA military had national socialists from Germany working on tick bourne bacterial diseases. Check a map to see the distance to Lyme from Plum island.
But an article in zerohedge showed me some new ones:
In 1977 a laboratory in Russia (or possibly China), most likely while developing a flu vaccine, accidentally released the extinct H1N1 influenza virus (Nakajima et al., 1978).
In 2007, Britain experienced a foot and mouth disease outbreak. Its’ origin was a malfunctioning waste disposal system of a BSL-4 laboratory leaking into a stream from which neighbouring cows drank. The disposal system had not been properly maintained (Furmanski, 2014).
(https://www.zerohedge.com/health/two-doctors-explain-why-covid-19-was-likely-lab-experiment)
A science fiction writer and a porn star. Probably produce data commensurate in quality with most of the other so-called experts.
They didn’t release the actual data, nor their methods. They’d be ripe for a job in alarmist climate science.
Covid-1984
Big Pharma gets what they pay for. Doctors whose advice is “off message” get attacked, their videos get deleted and they are blocked from social media.
Talk about reach! Note the use of the term “controversial” when referring to HCQ. It was these same media that invented the idea of “controversializing” someone or something by always referring to it is “controversial” (whatever that means in context).
Why would the Lancet published such assailable material? That is a good research question. More than 100 doctors wrote to the Lancet in the following 2 days complaining about the article. The Lancet has backed down twice since then. I wonder whose hand is yanking their chain and whose hand is holding the leash.
Thats the boot in the face of mankind-for eternity
George Orwell was talking about.
Is it even possible to be embarrassed on behalf of the powers that be, at this point? They’re pitifully bad at this.
Great but not surprising. What a pity that I would have to sully myself and go the GRUANIARD sorry Gardian to read it.
I will wait for some other brave person to do so and let me know the outcome.
Of course any and all adverse reports on that “controversial” drug, which has been in use for over 40 years, are used to try to oust President Trump.
Lancet editor is an Extinction Rebellion supporter.
Lancet Editor’s Backing For Extinction Rebellion (28 Mar)
The government has various different teats to suck from. The climate science/ green energy teat is a big one of course, but the medical teat is probably even bigger.
Anyone with a brain knows hydroxychloroquine works. It is 100 percent political and zero percent science.