New Video : Alterations To The US Temperature Record (Part One)

NewTube Link

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to New Video : Alterations To The US Temperature Record (Part One)

  1. Jeff L. says:

    Great video Tony. I hope that you can post it to YouTube once your ban is lifted. I personally don’t care at all about YouTube, but I know that your video will reach a wider audience if also posted there.

  2. Joe says:

    Excellent work!

  3. Donna says:

    This was interesting. Weather, it seems, can be manipulated on paper, just like the science concerning the current global pandemic. I have lived where I live now since 1989. Our summers get hot; but, are they getting progressively hotter? It doesn’t feel like it. Our current governor is pushing the climate change narrative to explain the wildfires. I’m not buying it. If a wildfire isn’t started by a lightning strike, then it has to be started by a human, either accidentally or intentionally. Fire needs three things: fuel, oxygen, and a spark.

  4. Conrad Ziefle says:

    This whole NOAA process of managing temperature data is baffling, kind of a Gordian Knot which defies unravelling. I don’t even know where to begin to ask questions, and can only come up with random thoughts that point to various nodes in the knot: 1. Science involves intelligently collecting data and then recognizing what the data implies. It’s not about altering the data to show something that you thought it should show you. 2. When you alter data, you integrate your subjectivity, what you think should be happening, into what did happen. That’s not science. 3. As you have pointed out in your most recent video and the associated post, the altered NASA and NOAA data does exactly that in an embarrassingly similar manner to a high school science student cook booking his lab data to closely reflect the expected result. The difference is that the lab student is usually smart enough to make his data drift about, reflecting his poor equipment and experimental controls. The NOAA and NASA data precisely matches the CO2 warming theory, which is highly suspect because the earth is not a controlled laboratory system and there are 1000s of uncontrollable variables. One would expect the correlation to be much weaker, like for instance, the one shown in the graph of the unaltered USHCN temperature vs CO2 data.
    Surprise, surprise!

  5. John G. Dawson says:

    Thanks once again Tony. Did you do any fact-checking on Biden’s claims about the fires during the debate?

  6. Collister Johnson says:

    When NASA was running the Space Shuttle Program, it was happy to take members of the House Appropriations Committee on board the ship, until Challenger blew up. Like any other federal agency dependent on federal appropriations for its budget, it will do pretty much do anything, say anything, be anything to assure the money is there. So – fudging climate temperature numbers to keep the pols happy. What’s the problem?

  7. Twain got it right
    Judge a guy like you by his enemies

    Wings starting to grow?? Bro?
    Living Saints live the Good Life
    You make it better every day!

  8. Lance Koberlein says:

    You are doing important work! We need more people like you willing to fight the good fight!

  9. John Sweeney says:

    Looks like NOAA concedes on this one. They blame their algorithm.

  10. Steve Cooksey says:

    A great article in the Epoch Times last week explaining how communism has hijacked the environmental movement and how differing opinions and facts are being silenced. The truth must be crushed. Scary times, people.

  11. Royce Longden says:

    hi tony,, lots of truth tellers are now going on to BRAND NEW TUBE,, might be worth a shot… some folks are just doing a short youtube vid telling subscribers they have put a full vid on to bnt.. just a suggestion, keep up the good work :)

  12. Allan Shelton says:

    When Trump is reelected he ha some serious swamp draining to do at NOAA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.