Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- arn on Rule Of Law Defined By Left Wing Hysterics
- Conrad Ziefle on 100% Renewable In Germany
- GWS on Rule Of Law Defined By Left Wing Hysterics
- Conrad Ziefle on Rule Of Law Defined By Left Wing Hysterics
- Conrad Ziefle on Rule Of Law Defined By Left Wing Hysterics
Archives
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Back to the 1970’s.The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) has a chart showing the number and intensity of cyclones hitting Australia, dating back to 1970, when the planet had a ‘very safe’ level of CO2, of 320 ppm.
This chart shows a very clear decrease in cyclone activity around Australia. When it was first published, the chart was colored, in two shades of blue, dark blue and light blue. A month later it was changed to the mandatory, scary, climate change colors of, red and yellow.
I’ll bet my bippy, the next version will show an, “adjusted”, much flatter chart, showing very little, or no, decrease. I just wish I could do a “screen print”, like I used to be able to do with the old Windows program.
Get ‘Snip & Sketch’ – you just highlight whatever it is and then you have a picture that you can save. Good luck!
Got it Michael. Thank You!
https://archive.is/
It will take a screen dump style page snapshot, you just need to bookmark the URL of the final result.
The “350 ppm safe carbon level” is just a new propaganda buzzterm and ultimate truth
(or in this case:desired goal that must be reached no matter what(while they are 100% aware that it can never be reached)
for further indoctrination.)
BS that was most probably created by the Bilderberg group
or some other globalist group for indoctrination.
Therefore noone of the ‘experts’ will ever wonder,
why round numbers are always the main tipping point and not numbers
that ends with a 5,4 or 7.
(the answer is simple:Just as alliterations(build back better,fridays for future)it is easier for human brains to memorize round numbers and therefore
the propaganda and scare effect is much bigger)
Noone will ask why and how life on earth survived during millions and millions
of years of co2 levels far above 350 ppm?
And noone will ask how ‘scientist’ who on the one hand are even too dumb and too slow
to correctly measure the constant sea level rise of 3 mm per year thats going on for millenias,(so they can sell the “we will all drown” scare)
have on the other hand the incredible skills and accuracy to predict
the climatic impact of a millionth increase of co2 .
I worked on this issue in late 80s. Hansen’s doom porn forecast was nothing less than an excuse used to increase NASA (and DOE) funding. From 1981 to 2013, Hansen was the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen#Career
This was a period when oil prices collapsed, Reagan was President, and the 70s Energy Crisis spending on conservation was cut back along with discretionary gov budgets. Hundreds of bureaucrats and scientists in Washington DC were scrambling to recreate themselves to create employment and AGW was a thing to throw money at to study as opposed to propaganda to promote energy efficient appliances. NASA was on top of it to use potential disaster as key excuse to get millions of $ allocated to it by Congress.
This was a money thing to keep agency budgets. In UK it was a political thing as Thatcher battled the unionized and nationalized coal industry with conservative gov throwing money at the Hadley Centre for Climate Research and Prediction,
https://www.masterresource.org/climate-exaggeration/thatcher-alarmist-to-skeptic/ There was also a seeding to the IPCC. These government entities grew like weeds to take a direction on their own to promote theories and doom porn to preserve their existence and the well being of those deriving their incomes from such.
I think the phrase “Countless Scientists” is being misunderstood. It really means scientists who can’t count, and therefore are not scientists at all. Did anyone see that goofball on CNN talking about how they have been watching the ice melt in the Artic for decades? Now, she says (finally) black things are poking through giving “feedback” to the warming effect. From the graphs that I’ve seen here, it seems that for decades the Artic ice has gone up and down cyclically, mostly within two standard deviations of the mean, so I don’t know what she has been watching for decades.
On the other hand, can you imagine anything more boring than being a “climate scientist?” By definition you have to wait three life times to accumulate solid evidence that your theory is correct. Knowing this, they just voodoo up stuff to make themselves the high priests of progressives. It’s amazing how universities have given over large portions of their campuses to voodoo priests.