The Doomsday Variant

3:24 AM · Aug 4, 2021

2:11 PM · Aug 3, 2021

Meanwhile back in the real world – COVID-19 hospitalizations remain near a record low and are almost non-existent among children.

CDC COVID Data Tracker

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to The Doomsday Variant

  1. arn says:

    Wasn’t newsweek the paper that warned in spring 1983 that the ice age will kill us all before they switched in summer 1983 as first magazin to global warming will kill us all?

    But let me translate
    “Scientists fear that future mutations of the virus…..”
    =
    “Elitists from Davos and the Bilderbergers have plans to exploit the virus
    as long as possible(or until the virus is replaced by a more leathal one)
    as this is the only realistic scenario besides WW2 to implement draconic laws restrict rights(the fabian) and bring the world population down.
    If necessary new,more leathal mutations will be created in the labs”

  2. Scott Allen says:

    The CDC is lying to the public!!!!
    as of the 27th of July numbers on their website. I am uses the 22 May 2021 as an example. The deaths from all causes, but attribute the excess deaths to Covid.

    on 22 may 2021
    Average number of deaths 53,748
    Upper bounds of deaths 55,354
    Predicted number of deaths 57,200

    on 21 May 2020
    Average number of deaths 53,385
    Upper Bounds of deaths 55,071
    Predicted number of deaths 61,630

    but on the 25 May 2019
    Average number of deaths 54,360
    Upper Bounds of deaths 55,921
    Predicted number of deaths 53,846.

    2019 was BEFORE the pandemic and the CDC labeled 55,921 deaths as the upper bounds (over which would be excessive deaths)
    in 2020 and 2021 they lowered the Upper Bounds of deaths to 55,071 and 55,354.

    In addition they CDC changes the Upper Bounds of deaths (excess deaths) to be lower than the actual deaths about every 10 days, thus insuring that the excessive death can be shown and attributed to Covid. You can do your own research, archive the CDC numbers then check in a week to 10 days and the upper bounds will be changed to always show excessive deaths, and be below historical numbers. The CDC now claims fewer people should/will die in their 2021 numbers then did died in 2019 based on their averages, how is that possible with an increasing population? And the excess deaths have been higher then in past years as well.

    The CDC keeps ‘adjusting’ the three numbers ‘average’,’excess’ and ‘predicted’ deaths
    The CDC even admits that they changed the method for making their predictions. On September 9th of 2020 the ‘new accounting’ lowered the number of excessive deaths by 5% (this is from their website)

    I have taken screen shots every couple of weeks of the weekly data from their graphs which shows the continual ‘adjustments of their prediction and the lowering of the excess deaths number (maybe to make the ‘pandemic’ look worse?

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

    • arn says:

      In Germany it’s the same thing.

      The overall death numbers are exactly as expected/predicted before covid appeared
      and are similar to the years before covid.
      I do not think that covid is a nothing as co2 as it was created in the labs for this specific purpose ,
      but it’s just another fart in the wind they abuse to implement
      unpopular laws by
      calling it a hurricane.

      The rhetorics and tricks used are pretty much the same:
      Noone cared about the people who were killed by the flu.
      It was irrellevant,just as droughts and floods were.
      But all of a sudden it’s an ultimate catastrophy.
      If 1000 people suffered and died from eg. covid 18 noone cared,
      but if now 100 die from covid 19 it’s a tragedy that justifys lockdowns
      and vaccination propaganda.

      As Hitler said.
      “The bigger the lie,the more people will believe it”

      “If you controle the Media you can make heaven appear as hell
      and hell as heaven”

  3. Walter Wagner says:

    The hospitalizations would be far fewer if all doctors used the established treatment protocols (HCQ/ZN/Vit-D/Ivermectin).

    • Gerald Machnee says:

      Except that will not sell the “vaccine” which the corrupt CDC is involved in.

    • Ed Price says:

      I asked my Melbournian Doctor for prescription of Ivermectin (which is available here).
      He refused but it is OK for worms!
      I’ve emailed TGA (our CDC/FDA) and not yet receive a reply.

  4. Louis Gatto says:

    Stupid is …as Stupid does.

    …I do feel a sense of doom though -always being governed by imbeciles.

    Louis

  5. Don B says:

    In the UK, while Delta driven Covid cases surged, deaths did not jump.

    Also, in the US, Covid deaths in all age groups are near zero.

    Scroll towards the bottom of this article to see those graphs.

    https://wmbriggs.com/post/36809/

    • GreyGeek says:

      Near zero indeed. Even in Florida, where testing has reached 21K+ cases the number of daily deaths is around the 50’s. John Hopkins Hospital has a webpage which shows the daily new cases for all 50 states on one page using small graphs for each state:
      https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/new-cases-50-states
      You may have to roll your screen in or out to find the sweet spot for graphs to display.
      The graph for Florida shows a strong spike, higher than the 3rd wave, but when you go to worldinfo or the CDC websites you see that the spike in the daily number of cases, 21,000+, is not matched by a spike in the daily number of deaths, 69.
      Such massive discrepancies suggests that the DNC’s data is being tampered, but the DND’s counts cannot be because they are based on a legal document, the death certificate. That can only be tampered with if the coroner deliberately mis-assigns the death, like in several Florida cases where the doctor attributed the death of a 17 year old who died in a motorcycle accident to death “with” covid, or the 69 year old man who had been battling brain cancer and died from it, but the widow noticed the death “with” covid assignment on the death certificate.
      Using Benford’s Law the DNC data always failed but the DND data never did.

      The CARES Act pads payments of hospitalized covid patients with by 10% or more and up to 30%+ if they are put on a ventilator. So, it is to the hospital’s financial advantage to admit as many covid patients as it can, and to move as many of those patients as they can to ventilators.

  6. BARTE SHADLOW says:

    Enough with the overrated, overused PCR tests!

    • David A says:

      It would be nice to know…
      How many people in each group were tested, both vaccinated and not vaccinated.
      How many cycles were run on the tests.
      What the mean cycle count was when a positive result occurred.

      • czechlist says:

        not only the Ct but the amount of replication. I propose they are testing so much they are short cutting the replication and overusing Ct resulting in false positives.
        I am also suspicious of the “clearing house” for all of the numbers – who is watching the watchers – who counts the votes.

  7. Guilherme Gomes says:

    Very special if we had the 2019!

  8. Ed Price says:

    The PCR ct number is never disclosed, so cases do not reveal how many are infected.
    If the ct is 45, the inaccuracy of the PCR test is around 95% – ie for every 100 tested positive only 5 are actually infected. A major lie. The inventor of PCR the test said maximum ct should be around 26.
    It also appears that the PCR test has no coronavirus to test, they are probably using a flu virus, which ight explain the absence of flu around the world.

    • GreyGeek says:

      Supposedly, the Ct’s are repeated until the dye becomes visible in the microscope. A lower Ct means a greater viral load. A high Ct means a lower or non-existent viral load, since the inventor of the RT-PCR test, Kay Mullis, stated that at a Ct of 35 or higher you can find anything in anybody.

  9. GreyGeek says:

    72,000 !!! OMG! They all are going to die!
    Or at least that’s what the media wants folks to assume. The reality is
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm
    which shows that for the last 18 months, Jan 1,2020 to August 4, 2021, the total number of kids in the 0-17 age group that died of Covid19 totaled to 349. That’s all.
    The media, and the authorities they shill for, are pushing the idea that having a positive test for covid is the same as being sick. It is not. Most kids who have covid don’t even know it, and rarely show any symptoms. In one of the few times he hasn’t lied, Fauci stated that “asymptomatic carriers are not super spreaders”.

  10. Linda says:

    If they tested millions of people for anything at any time they would find the same results. Bits of virus and all sorts of other bugs, it’s just that they don’t normally spend a fortune on frantically testing healthy people who have no symptoms of any illness.
    Especially using a test that was never designed for the purpose and can’t be relied on anyway.

    • arn says:

      They also didn’t spent a fortune on climate.

      But since they started we are all gonna die from global warming.

      The more tests are done(no matter on which illness)
      the more ill people will be diagnosed with some kind of illness
      (and the more “experts” are willing to find more ill people to scam off money)
      and the demographic woulf soon change from 90% healthy:10% ill ratio
      to 10%healthy/90% ill ratio
      though the overall health the population hasn’t changed a iota.
      The only thing that has changed is that irrellevant fluctuations inside
      the body,which previously went unnoticed
      are now part of the statistics.

      Nothing has changed except the quantity of data and the fact
      that they went from a common sense level of testing
      to a pedantic forensic that requires perfection.

      The trick/method that is used in this case is just a variation of the critical theory
      where only certain countries/people are required to hold up to perfect standards (or they are racist)
      while the rest is still treated the normal(or even preferential=racist way)

      Objective reality replaced by agitation,activism and propaganda
      to achieve specific goals.

  11. Gerald Machnee says:

    For the real source of the “virus” and the “vaccine”.
    Watch the video to see that it has all been patented. Even the “cure” was patented before the outbreak. The Dossier listes the 5,000+ patents.

    David Martin
    A manufactured illusion. Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/aWXalrBhYAck/
    Dr David Martin gives his testimony to Reiner Fuellmich 9/7/21
    Dr David Martin’s dossier – https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/The-FauciCOVID-19-Dossier2532.pdf

  12. Ray Getting says:

    In the CDC’s own statement (https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0730-mmwr-covid-19.html), and the “data” they say back up the mask mandate (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w), is based on a study in Barnstable County in Massachusetts from “multiple summer events and large public gatherings were held in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, that attracted thousands of tourists from across the United States. …. Persons with COVID-19 reported attending densely packed indoor and outdoor events at venues that included bars, restaurants, guest houses, and rental homes.” Hardly the conditions that most people engage in on a daily basis but, hey, put on a mask if you’re going to the local grocery store or sitting in your local church.

    Nowhere in this study is there direct evidence that the 469 cases (only 5 were hospitalized and no deaths) were transmitted from a vaccinated person. But, the word “might” appears 7 times in the article to solidify their absolute confidence in the CDC’s mandate that everyone should wear masks indoors.

    The article admits its limitations (see paragraph 2 under “Discussions”) and the second paragraph, highlighted by two key instances of the word “might” , provides enough uncertainty to question how this study could be used to say with seemingly no doubt that vaccinated people are infecting others. They also admit that further studies are needed to confirm their findings.

    “Ct values obtained with SARS-CoV-2 qualitative RT-PCR diagnostic tests might provide a crude correlation to the amount of virus present in a sample and can also be affected by factors other than viral load.††† Although the assay used in this investigation was not validated to provide quantitative results, there was no significant difference between the Ct values of samples collected from breakthrough cases and the other cases. This might mean that the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 is also similar. However, microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings.

  13. Mickey says:

    It’s important to note that the CDC hospitalization graph only includes the 100 counties that are in the COVID-NET system. The counties in this system are across the states of CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, TN). Read the find print at the bottom of the graph. This is NOT the the hospitalizations across the entire country.

Leave a Reply to Gerald Machnee Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *