“Vaccine apparently worked”

An acquaintance of mine in Massachusetts sent a message this morning.

“No covid19 symptoms either, vaccine apparently worked. Same for me…”

He had to leave his office one day last week to take his fully vaccinated daughter to the emergency room with some “very strange medical issues.” But they wouldn’t see her because she tested positive for COVID-19. She is feeling better today and he has determined from this episode that the “vaccine apparently worked.

During the summer he had to rush his son to the emergency room due to what he described as a “bad reaction to the vaccine.” He also took the day before Thanksgiving off work because he expected to have a reaction to his booster shot.

COVID-19 Raw Data – December 3, 2021

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to “Vaccine apparently worked”

  1. william says:

    Why No EUA for Highly Effective, Anti-COVID fluvoxamine?

    Published on December 5, 2021

    Written by Steve Kirsch

    The reason is simple. We tried. And after 6 weeks of waiting, we were told that to get an EUA for a repurposed drug, you have to partner with a drug company in the EUA application.

    Because no drug company will partner with us, even if we pay all the filing costs, there won’t be an EUA. Ever. So most doctors will never prescribe it for COVID, even thought it works better than anything else.

    And the NIH won’t do anything with fluvoxamine either like add it to their guidelines. It will never be upgraded on the NIH COVID treatment guidelines. It is currently sitting at “NEUTRAL” after two trials where it had a 100% risk reduction in both trials without any downside risk. In short, if deployed it would likely save a lot of lives and there is no risk of deployment since the risks of the drug are well known. It’s a very safe drug when properly prescribed. I took it myself and I couldn’t tell I was on it the side-effects were so negligible.

    When the fluvoxamine Phase 3 study published in Lancet showed the drug worked better than any other drug (including the new antiviral pills from Merck and Pfizer), the NIH simply ignored the study. They didn’t even mention it.

    Even 60 Minutes which did a story on fluvoxamine didn’t mention the Phase 3 study proved it worked when the study came out (normally, they’d do this at the end of a show to let their audience know they got it right).

    Fluvoxamine provides a 12-fold reduction in death if you started the drug early, but the NIH basically said “Ho hum. Only 12X reduction in death? That’s better than anything including the vaccines (which according to the Pfizer 6 month Phase 3 study was only a 2X reduction in mortality). So not even worth mentioning in the guidelines. It would save too many lives. Best to ignore it. And if we ignore it, no doctor in America will dare to prescribe it. So the vaccine will be the only option just like we planned.”

    Cliff Lane, who heads the guidelines committee, reports to Fauci. Cliff simply isn’t going to allow the NIH recommendation to be modified no matter what the science says. This is not about saving lives. It never was.

    When the key opinion leader (KOL) panel of NIH, CDC, FDA and academia experts recommended fluvoxamine be used back in January 2021, the NIH ignored that too. Jeffrey Klausner, who convened the panel, wrote a great op-ed about it in the Washington Post right after the meeting so everyone would know. Doctors ignored it.

    Klausner shopped the KOL meeting notes to 10 journals, all of whom refused to publish it. Truly stunning! Life saving drug and nobody would publish the recommendation of an expert panel to use it. Wow.

    When the KOL meeting notes were finally published in the peer-reviewed medical literature on December 1, 2021, only 12 months after the meeting, the NIH again did absolutely nothing, ignoring the advice of these key experts, even though now they have more data from the Together trial showing it works.

    Basically, the system is set up so that only proprietary drugs that can kill you are approved.

    So I wasted a lot of time and millions of dollars on proving that fluvoxamine works against COVID. I was right it does work. But Fauci is only going to allow a big Pharma solution to be adopted. Doctors do not follow the science. They follow what the NIH says. I should have known better. All these scientists had promised me “once it is proven in Phase 3 trials, everyone will adopt it.” That was a big fat lie. I fell for it. I won’t be so naïve the next time.

    Note: I didn’t used to be so cynical, but there is simply no other rational explanation for this. This isn’t about science. This isn’t about saving lives. This is about profits and big pharma. Get it? I finally did. It was an expensive lesson.

    See my fluvoxamine article for more info about how you can use it to save your life if you get COVID. Don’t expect your doctor to tell you about it.

    More at stevekirsch.substack.com

    • Marko says:

      This is gold. Thanks.

    • Conrad Ziefle says:

      At some point, rational people are going to have to take control of this country, and when they do, they are going to have to deliver justice for all the people who died and suffered unnecessarily because our national health governance got entangled with the commercial aspects of health care. If you accept that fascism is government that manages the people to benefit the economic gain of businesses, then the handling of the COVID pandemic has been pure fascism worldwide.
      Read RFK JR’s book on Fauci.
      I don’t know enough about the fluvoxamine, but it was brought up in one of the Dark Horse, Bret Weinstein, Q and A sessions where basically they stated that they felt HCQ and ivermectin, both of which are also suppressed, would have less side effects than fluvoxamine, but all three were less dangerous than the vaccines. All three have been suppressed.
      I would be happy to have any of them available.

    • arn says:

      ALL of this is(Co2,Covid,Vaccines etc ) designed to shift money to a certain group of people and to centralise everything in a very few hands – be it Pfizer,Amazon etc.
      They already have quasi monopoles with Facebook,Google,News etc.
      Now the other corporations will be built up that way,competition destroyed (“” competition is a sin”” – JD Rockefeller )

      It is no coincidence that the massive growth of big corporations coincides with with the powergrab by UN and WHO.

    • Barnes Moore says:

      They deep-six’d HcQ and IVM as well. If fluvoxamine is an FDA approved drug, real doctors will not hesitate to prescribe if for off-label use, just like Dr. Fareed in the Imperial Valley did with HcQ and IVM, the Front Line Doctors, and the FLCCC doctors. It is truly a crime against humanity that our health agencies, big pharma, and the MSM have conspired to suppress the re-purposing of safe and effective drugs. Had they embraced the use of IVM and HcQ early on when doctors were using one or the other, or both, to actually treat patients and were achieving very positive outcomes, this scamdemic would have been obliterated by mid 2020. If you are not aware of how Uttar Pradesh dealt with covid, look it up in Trial Site News or The Desert Review

  2. Robert F Kennedy Jr.’s book The Real Anthony Fauci has a lot of good information on the games played by NIH/FDA/Big Pharma. The corruption and lies that we see being played out with Covid-19 have been an everyday thing with Big Pharma government for years.

  3. Conrad Ziefle says:

    The Massachusetts thing is wrong in so many ways. Why is he subjecting his children to the vaccine when he has already gotten signals that their bodies might not be able to handle it? Even in Nazi Massachusetts, I assume, one can get a medical exemption from the vaccines.
    Why are hospitals refusing to accept COVID positive patients? I also assume that Massachusetts has mandated that all hospital workers have the full vaccine regime. What is the purpose of that if you are going to deny services to COVID + patients?
    My daughter is an emergency room nurse on the opposite coast, and she jumped right in and got the booster. I asked her why, and she said she is around COVID patients all the time. I’ll have to ask whether they turn COVID + patients back at the hospital where she works. I do know they are low on staff because of mandates and burn out.
    Anyway, I got the *#!*## booster only because I thought my body could handle it, having gotten through the “complete” vaccine process last February. I am a month out, and at this point, I am still feeling fatigue occasionally and have a few other odd but seemingly minor issues.
    I’m actually hoping that the Omicron variant turns out to be very mild and greatly infectious. Then maybe Mother Nature will defeat the vaccine cabal by providing a free natural immunity.

  4. Anon says:

    This could be an argument against taking the VAERS system offline:

    How a Vaccine Side-Effect Database Sowed Doubt in Vaccinations

    Transparent communication is especially key to gaining the trust of those skeptical or hesitant of vaccines. And trust — far more than facts — is critical to changing people’s minds.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-05/how-a-vaccine-side-effect-database-sowed-doubt-in-vaccinations

    Because, as you point out, these VAERS incidents are proof of the vaccine working.

    *The article is a hoot. They want trust and won’t even admit where the virus came from… and I won’t even get into what they do with the climate data. But trust us they say… that ship sailed a long time ago.

  5. Laurie says:

    At the direction of the NIH, the vaccines’ ‘payload’ encodes the *entire* spike protein – itself the (principle) pathogenic feature of the SARS CoV-2 virus! The NIH own the patent for the S-protein configuration utilized in the vaccines, by the way. Coincidence??? A needle in every arm? Perpetuating the disease!

    Can someone shed some light on the following? The primers employed in at least some of the original PCR tests encompassed at least one subunit of the S-protein sequence, so how effectively do such tests distinguish (natural) infection from ‘innoculation’? Recall the guidance on the PCR cycle count was dramatically lowered for the vaccinated.

    Effectively, the vaccine is the means by which the pathogen is communicated, not arrested. “My people perish for lack of knowledge.” God help us.

    Best.

  6. Anon says:

    I thought this was interesting, because it mirror’s Tony’s post.

    UPDATE FROM UK FUNERAL DIRECTOR JOHN O’ LOONEY

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/OTvtHkCNzlNE/

    I can’t attest to the veracity of everything he says, but he says that he has acquaintances who: “feel ill and believe that the solution to how they feel is to get another jab”.

    It all seems upside down.

    If you have to go to the ER or take a day off it means the jab is working, and if you feel ill afterward, the solution is another jab. wtf?

    Very strange!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.