# 69% Of Hospitalized In NSW Are Double Vaccinated

In New South Wales there are 1399 hospitalized who are double injected, and 585 who are uninjected.

2022-01-13 COVID-19 cases, variants, vaccines, hospitalisations and deaths

Note this fake statistic, which doesn’t correspond to the other data in the table.

“Hospital rate among unvaccinated / double vaccinated population (aged 12+) 1,052.0 / 176.3”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

### 18 Responses to 69% Of Hospitalized In NSW Are Double Vaccinated

1. arn says:

Damn it.
I was 100% sure that in this case Pfizer,for the first time in history,
was trying to help people instead of going after their money and health.

I’m not sure how they are calculating it, but it doesn’t match the rest of the table. However, if their data is correct, then the rate of hospitalization of the unvac’ed is higher than the vac’d. 29/22= hospitalization rate of unvac’d; 69/78 is the rate of the vac’c. And 1.3/.88 =1.51. or 51% more likely to be in the hospital if unvac’d. Hope I did my math right. It’s from the hip. This however does not include those who suffer vaccine related health issues and hospitalization. When you ignore the risks of being vaccinated, this anecdotal information shows vaccinations help. Unfortunately, we don’t have a third group who has access to ivermectin to compare to. I suggest that to get a reasonable analysis, they allow all those who wish to use ivermectin to be able to do so under a doctor’s guidance, and then compare that group to those who don’t.

3. Scissor says:

Unvaccinated does not necessarily mean unjabbed. For a time, one jab = unvaccinated. Two jabs + 2 weeks = unvaccinated. And now less than 3 jabs = unvaccinated.

• Liam says:

This is an extremely important point.

• arn says:

Unvaccinated means whatever they want it to mean.

They change definition on daily basis.
while we went from 1 vaccine to 2 + booster
they went from 10 isolation days to 5
( while the fourth Reich in Germany went the opposite way: the RKi changed the status for immunity after recovering from 180 to 90 days – to help pfizers profit)

Everything is as arbitrary as with climate science except that they protect the virus as good as they can by making effective drugs Ivermectin,monoclonals etc unobtainable to save the mandatory vax scenario.

4. jon says:

80% of the population and 90% of the old are vaccinated in Canada.

So if the vaccine had zero effect, you’d expect 5 to 9 times as many vaxxed as unvaxxed in hospital.

But the vaccines in not ineffective in preventing death, prevention of which after all is the outcome most desired

About 8x the unvaxxed deaths than vaxxed.

And 5 to 10 times the population sample vaxxed compared with unvaxxed.

So the vaxxed death rate is about 8 times, multiplied by population proportions at an optimistic 5 times meaning the actual death rate among the unvaxxed is 40 times higher than among the vaxxed.

Just saying.

Look at the whole picture, not an over simplified number that tells you what you believe you want to hear.

• Jacek says:

How many people were vaxxed in December 2020? How many were “fully protected” then? How many died during 2 weeks after jab (“not yet protected” is it the same as killed by jab)?
You need more detailed figures to draw conclusions than all cases dumped together.

• Ken says:

These figures Jon quoted are misleading since they cover the whole year of 2021 including the first four months when less than 10% of the population were fully vaccinated. Therefore as most deaths occurred during these first four months, around 10,000, the comparison is meaningless. Better to compare numbers since the vaccine uptake was at least 50% which would probably be from around June 2021, then you will see a more accurate comparison but of course I know they don’t want to publish these numbers!

• Timo, Not That One says:

They are fooling you with statistics. The deaths of un jabbed includes the deaths before the jab was even available. In Ontario, they also don’t test jabbed people going to hospital even when they are presenting with covid symptoms. Thus, jabbed people who die from covid are less likely to be counted as covid deaths. You can’t trust the official numbers because they don’t want to admit that the jab hasn’t worked to stop the virus.
Furthermore, they don’t want to mention the increase in overall deaths, most of which have nothing to do with covid, but have everything to do with the jab.
The truth will out, but it may take a long time.
Those of us working in healthcare can see first hand how may side effects people are presenting with. These are side effects, which in many cases are life changing. They shouldn’t be ignored.

• jon says:

Interesting perspective, I’d like to ask for information or clarity on a bunch of points;

“They are fooling you with statistics. The deaths of un jabbed includes the deaths before the jab was even available.”

In the daily and monthly figures that’s just not true – and the daily and monthly numbers paint a picture of 10x hospitalizations from 1/5th of the population (picking unvaxxed Canada at random). So DAILY hospital admissions by that method are 50x higher for the unvaxxed. Obviously there’s room to doubt that number. But more than 50x adjustment from these raw figures? Thats a reach.

“In Ontario, they also don’t test jabbed people going to hospital even when they are presenting with covid symptoms. Thus, jabbed people who die from covid are less likely to be counted as covid deaths. You can’t trust the official numbers because they don’t want to admit that the jab hasn’t worked to stop the virus.”

Yep, if the test thing is systematically true then it might distort the numbers. You speak of Ontario. By more than 50x?

Looks like Canadian testing is falling over generally, affecting both vaxxed and unvaxxed.

Can you provide any data to backup any of this?

“Furthermore, they don’t want to mention the increase in overall deaths, most of which have nothing to do with covid, but have everything to do with the jab.”

Again, meaningful data sources would be appreciated.

“The truth will out, but it may take a long time.”

And until it does, we must analyse the data we have, not work on supposition and rumour. Yep, might not be right. But rumour gets us way less close.

“Those of us working in healthcare can see first hand how may side effects people are presenting with. These are side effects, which in many cases are life changing. They shouldn’t be ignored.”

I don’t get why most voices from the healthcare system seem to say the opposite.

Some detail around what these life changing and heavily concealed side effects are would also be helpful.

Otherwise it MIGHT be suggested you’re blowing smoke to support a pre-existing belief system.

• Timo, Not That One says:

Funny how you brush everybody off with a “do you have evidence” but I’ll bet you would never ask a politician or news reader if they can show us proof that they have isolated the virus called Covid19 or any of the variants. Would you ask anybody if they have evidence that the mRNA shots show an absolute reduction in injury and death in a controlled, double blind, experiment? There should be two years worth of data by now. Where is that evidence?
You appear to be a biased, paid shill for the pharmaceutical companies, as far as I can tell.
Can you show me some proof that you are not?

• Gerald Machnee says:

There is also one more very important part missing in the vaxxed vs unvaxxed:
IF, IF the TV “experts” had given the people even ONE bit of advice, there would not be as many deaths among either especially the unvaxxed. NOBODY said anything about boosting your immunity by increasing your Vitamin D, C, Zinc and Quercetin. If that would have been done the deaths would be down by 80%. But the drug pushers do not want that so people die in order they they sell their bioweapons and kill more.
Dr. Zeleneko said Vitamin D, Zinc and Quercetin are like a 22 calibre and Ivermectin is like a machine gun.

I like that. I’ve got me 22 well oiled and operating efficiently. My machine gun is locked up in the back room. But you are right; they have failed to let the public know about the simplest of things. It’s very odd. The fact that they have squelched all debate means that either they think we are too dumb to make daily decisions about our health, or the debate will bring out things they don’t want us to know. Either is bad. When this is over, a lot of people are going to put on trial.

• jon says:

Do you have any information as to the actual resultant benefits of the immune boosts?

5. Peter Carroll says:

One statistic that has not been investigated is, how long ago were these people vaccinated? When did they have their second dose?
This would give a clear indication of the length of time the vaccine is effective, given the seemingly rapid rise in infections among the, “fully vaccinated”.

There are a whole lot of things that need to be known. We are assuming that vaxed and unvaxed receive the same kind of treatment. We know nothing about therapies that were not used and may have been immensely valuable. There is a dearth of information at a time when we should be drowning in it.

• jon says:

Infections yes, but not deaths.

Vaccination still improves survival chances by an unknown but very high number.