World’s Most Educated People Weigh In

Another top researcher succumbs to the pressure of climate politics.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to World’s Most Educated People Weigh In

  1. Petr Chylek of Los Alamos National Laboratories is also the co author of this research paper published in Geophysical Research Letters June 2006 : ” Greenland warming of 1920 – 1930 and 1995 -2005 ” that reached these conclusions :

    ” Although the last decade of 1995 – 2005 was relatively warm ,almost all decades within 1915 to 1965 were even warmer at both the southwestern [ Godthab Nuuk ] and the southeastern [ Ammassalik ] coasts of Greenland ….The Greenland warming of ..1995 -2005 is similar to the warming of 1920 -1930 ,although the rate of temperature increase was by about 50% higher during the 1920 – 1930 warming period ”

    Did you catch that Tony ? ….” almost all decades within 1915 to 1965 were even warmer ” on the coasts of southern Greenland and the rapidity of warming was 50% faster during the decade 1920 – 1930 [ when atmospheric C02 was below 360 ppm ] than the comparable period 1995 – 2005 . This was before the Orwellian clock struck thirteen of course and someone got to Petr Chylek . If one examines the pre homogenized Reykjavik temperature series in Tony’s presentation , the sharp escalation in warming can be seen from 1920 – 1930 . It is there in the station datasets in Petr Chyleks 2006 paper as well . May 1921 was the date of an unusually powerful geomagnetic storm so it is plausible it was not just the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation responsible for warming the western Arctic

    Now we can see why Petr Chylek commenced the study at 1970 – five years after 1965 . The Climate Central sophists use the same truncation trick 1970 start date in their temperature chronologies

  2. rah says:

    In the end the weather will win. It is amazing how many “educated” people will not, or cannot, perceive or understand the difference between education and indoctrination.

  3. Eli the Pit Bulldog says:
  4. czechlist says:

    Cover all the “P”s.
    Publish or Perish. Politically Popular Positon+ Peer review / Pal review = Paper Published
    IMO there is something sinister afoot in the current social media/ cancel culture “climate”. Politics has infiltrated every faction of society and moral and ethical standards and norms are in flux. Almost everyone’s past social, political and scientific opinion can be accessed and interrogated. No one can be certain what standard they will be held to yesterday, today nor tomorrow.
    Watch your back as something innocent in your past can prove to be deadly today. Coercion /blackmail is the coin of the realm

  5. GWS says:

    Still asking — If Greenland is gaining ice every year where is it coming from? Are the oceans receding despite records of them rising? Does it come from space, or within the Earth? Where?

    • rah says:

      The wackos will start talking about “thermal expansion” when you put it that way.
      What I ask when they go off the deep end with their catastrophic SLR claims is: “Where is the water going to come from?”

      Greenland has a lot of ice but not nearly enough to cause the change many of them have been claiming are going to happen. Melting in only one place could cause their more outrageous claims for catastrophic SLR to be realized. Antarctica!

  6. GWS…the show that falls on the indland ice in Greenland is gradually being converted to ice, as it covered with new layers of snow. More show/ice is added each year through showfall (or hails, etc.) than what manages to melt of in the short sommer periodes in Southern Greenland, where the temperature exceeds the melting point.
    So in general, the amount of ice will always increase, were it not for the face that the glaciers from the inland ice flow out into the North Atlantic and break off.
    So the mass balance of the inland ice is: Snowfall MINUS (melt-off + icebergs broken off the glaciers). Obviously, the snow is water evaporated from the oceans. As far as I’m informed, the oceans are rising at a rate of approx. 2 mm a year. This is caused mainly by a very slow increase in the ocean temperature which causes the volume of sea water to expand. Note that increased temperature = more water in the air = more snowfall on the poles = growing ice caps, precisely because more ice doesn’t melt from the poles or Greenland if the temperature rises from -30 C to -28 C (or to -10 C). This is all basic physics, but there is SO much misinformation being spread all the time.
    Note that is the temperature on the poles was normally between – 5 C to +5 C, an increased temperature would certainly mean more melting ice, while I hope everybody can see that a temperature increase from -20 C to – 15 C doesn’t case more ice to melt…

  7. rah says:

    Speaking of Greenland and the Arctic. Whatever happened to that most faithful disciple of the climate change sect of Artic melting. Jim Hunt? I have not seen him post anything on any of the skeptic sites for quite some time.

  8. Daniel Smeal says:

    It’s evident that the same type of situation is going on here as with the Covid vaccine (and or HIV/AIDS) and Dr. Fauci (see ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ by R.F. Kennedy Jr.). Doctors and medical researchers that do not follow the Fauci and NIH narrative (that the Covid vaccine is the only effective treatment for the Chinese virus; or that the deadly AZT chemical is the only treatment for AIDS) are criticized, censored, and have their reputations destroyed. Their funding for research is cut off and they are shunned by professional journals if they dare present evidence and express opinions or conclusions in opposition to the Fauci narrative. While reading the book about Fauci, in fact, you can practically replace the names Fauci, NIAID, NIH, etc. with names such as Mann, Gore, NASA and the names of those opposition medical experts with names of climate researchers that present evidence in opposition to AGW. It’s all the same: go against the deep state narrative and they will destroy you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.