97% Of Scientists Agree

Last year the burning of fossil fuels was causing a permanent El Niño, but this year the burning of fossil fuels is causing a permanent La Niña.

Ongoing climate change could lead to a “permanent El Niño”.

Is never-ending La Niña the new normal? | KTLA

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to 97% Of Scientists Agree

  1. Eli the Pit Bulldog says:

    These climate con artist get everything exactly backwards

  2. roaddog says:

    No matter how high I set the thermostat in my home, it never gets warm enough in here the heat a bathtub full of cold water.

  3. As the evidence of a cooling, rather than a warming, trend becomes harder to ignore, the culprit will always be the same; human CO2 emissions. Herman Goering explained how the support of the German people was assured as long as they thought themselves attacked by an enemy within. This is the ploy used by the global elites, propagating derogatory terms as ‘anti-vaxxers’ and ‘climate deniers’ to unite the ignorant massses against the minority who actually employ their brains. It is a technique which can backfire, when it becomes common knowledge that the ‘green policies’ are merely a cover for genocidal population control policies championed by the same elites. Now that they have been exposed as the real enemies of humanity, they are desperately calling for censorship, before the masses get the message, and they become the targets of the mob.

    • Vegieman says:

      “On October 15, 1946, Hermann Göring, commander in chief of the Luftwaffe, president of the Reichstag, head of the Gestapo, prime minister of Prussia, chief forester of the Reich, chief liquidator of sequestered estates, supreme head of the National Weather Bureau, and Hitler’s designated successor dies by his own hand.”

      They all self destructed in the face of truth.

    • Petit_Barde says:

      I hope you are right but they (WEF, UN, …, and their henchmen) will not give up without trying a last disaster, a sort of “final solution” and it maybe that we are already induring this scheme as they are going bonkers with all this eco-vax-climate-energy-war madness.

  4. MGJ says:

    For those who live on a diet of Emmanuel Kant’s blue pills, reality doesn’t exist and even if it did, we would be fundamentally unable to experience it. Apart from when you disagree with them, then you are objectively wrong.

    Given that framework, everything they come out with makes a sort of perverted sense.

  5. GWS says:

    The dims have created multiple all-purpose boogymen fit for multiple scenarios to fool their own followers foremost.

  6. conrad ziefle says:

    Triple dip La Nina’s have happened every three decades or so over the last 70 years, so this one must be special, and forever. Why doesn’t he mention how many have occurred over the last 90 years? There is some reason, other than a nice, round number, that he picked 72 years as the time span worth talking about. And this winter hasn’t happened yet, so it might not even be a La Nina.

  7. conrad ziefle says:

    According to the diagram, whether El Nino or La Nina, or any other cloud forming activity, large plumes of hot water vapor rises high into the atmosphere, and because water vapor emits radiation over a large band of wavelengths, radiates huge amounts of heat to space, and then condenses and drops liquid water back on Earth.

  8. dm says:

    Perhaps climate change is a bipolar disorder.

    One year La Nina is permanent. Another year, El Nino is permanent.

    One decade Ice Ball Earth is the looming threat. Another decade, global warming is the threat.

    Permanent drought alarmism morphs with the weather into warnings of harms caused by too much precipitation.

    Maybe climate change alarmists need more lithium in their diets, rather than their cars.

  9. Disillusioned says:

    Every time the ‘permanent’ (insert the latest fear-porn-of-the-day here) stops being permanent, you never, ever hear a mea culpa. Contradictions simply don’t matter, because they know their audience are too busy with their own lives to catch the specifics. They just go on to the next fearmongering claim and prediction (which we know will also fail, just like every one in the past). Only the main message counts – climate change™ is bad, really bad. Rinse and repeat that message as often as possible.

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” — Joseph Goebbels

  10. Disillusioned says:

    It doesn’t matter if they contradict themselves. They are playing for all the marbles.

    “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
    – Adolf Hitler

  11. Ulric Lyons says:

    The last glacial maximum had near permanent El Nino conditions, and the Holocene Thermal Optimum had near permanent La Nina conditions. That should tell you what rising CO2 forcing in theory would do.

  12. Ulric Lyons says:

    The other way of looking at it is, that if rising CO2 forcing projects onto natural variability and increases positive North Atlantic Oscillation conditions, as the circulation models suggest, then it would tend to reduce the amplitude of El Nino conditions. As positive NAO is associated with faster trade winds. But we’ve had increased El Nino amplitude since 1995 because of weaker solar wind states.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.