Herding The Climate Sheep

In 1995, the New York Times predicted most east coast beaches would be gone by 2020.

Scientists Say Earth’s Warming Could Set Off Wide Disruptions – The New York Times

In 2013, Barack Obama said sea level rise threatened US cities, not long before he purchased a $15 million beachfront home.

Sep 26, 2019

The beach at Provincetown north of Obama’s mansion has grown since 1995.

“24% of the world’s sandy beaches are eroding at rates exceeding 0.5 m/yr, while 28% are accreting and 48% are stable.”

The State of the World’s Beaches | Scientific Reports

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Herding The Climate Sheep

  1. stumble guys says:

    I have a feeling that NASA will now want an intern to write 70 pages of scientific jargon to demonstrate the tremendous significance of the revisions.

  2. william says:

    satellite data illustrates 76% of world beaches are stable or accreting-


  3. GWS says:

    “I’m a democrat because they’re always right. They told me the oceans would rise if I kept driving my SUV, so I got a peddle-car and it hasn’t happened. That’s proof! So now I’m encouraging all my friends to get one, too.”

  4. conrad ziefle says:

    I think most Democrats view themselves as low achievers and cannot hold themselves accountable, hence there is some boogeyman that must be at fault. Now they may or may not actually be low achievers, but they think that they should have achieved more were it not for the unfairness of life. And I don’t think that they believe government can fix that, rather they want government to screw it up for the people that did better than they did. .

  5. arn says:

    Interesting that these “experts” completely fail with the most basic predictions 100% (with all things that are easy observable )
    and are so aware of the hoax that they spent billions on front beach property as soon as they have the money,
    yet people like McKinney are pooping their pants,because they focus on complex theories ,
    ignoring the fact that if the basics are wrong and can not be predicted
    than the complex stuff is total BS,
    as one can not claim to win a marathon race
    if they yet haven’t even learn how to walk.

    • A fundamentally erroneous theory necessarily becomes ever more complex for the same reason a compulsive gambler’s ‘system’ becomes more complex, there is the occasional spurious win, and the unshakable conviction that it will work ‘next time’. What is impressive about the fundamental laws of nature is their simplicity.

      • arn says:

        So an erroneous system = lie.
        As lies themselves become more and more complex the more cracks in the original story appear.
        And it gets more ‘complex’ (chaotic) as it needs more and more excuses(or tyranny) and new battlefields to exploit those until the new lies have been exposed and replaced by newer bigger one.
        (+ for the strategical Agenda Propagandist this is btw a welcome and wanted side effect,as mortal humans aren’t capable of understanding ‘complex stuff’ made up by divine experts)

        Inside a humans head such a strategy may cause some massive cognitive dissonance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *