In 1995, the New York Times predicted most east coast beaches would be gone by 2020.
Scientists Say Earth’s Warming Could Set Off Wide Disruptions – The New York Times
In 2013, Barack Obama said sea level rise threatened US cities, not long before he purchased a $15 million beachfront home.
The beach at Provincetown north of Obama’s mansion has grown since 1995.
“24% of the world’s sandy beaches are eroding at rates exceeding 0.5 m/yr, while 28% are accreting and 48% are stable.”
I have a feeling that NASA will now want an intern to write 70 pages of scientific jargon to demonstrate the tremendous significance of the revisions.
satellite data illustrates 76% of world beaches are stable or accreting-
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-24630-6
“I’m a democrat because they’re always right. They told me the oceans would rise if I kept driving my SUV, so I got a peddle-car and it hasn’t happened. That’s proof! So now I’m encouraging all my friends to get one, too.”
I think most Democrats view themselves as low achievers and cannot hold themselves accountable, hence there is some boogeyman that must be at fault. Now they may or may not actually be low achievers, but they think that they should have achieved more were it not for the unfairness of life. And I don’t think that they believe government can fix that, rather they want government to screw it up for the people that did better than they did. .
We’s got ta level the play’n field, so’s it’s equal for everybody to win!
Not level the playing field, tilt it to get the required result.
Clearly.
Interesting that these “experts” completely fail with the most basic predictions 100% (with all things that are easy observable )
and are so aware of the hoax that they spent billions on front beach property as soon as they have the money,
yet people like McKinney are pooping their pants,because they focus on complex theories ,
ignoring the fact that if the basics are wrong and can not be predicted
than the complex stuff is total BS,
as one can not claim to win a marathon race
if they yet haven’t even learn how to walk.
A fundamentally erroneous theory necessarily becomes ever more complex for the same reason a compulsive gambler’s ‘system’ becomes more complex, there is the occasional spurious win, and the unshakable conviction that it will work ‘next time’. What is impressive about the fundamental laws of nature is their simplicity.
So an erroneous system = lie.
As lies themselves become more and more complex the more cracks in the original story appear.
And it gets more ‘complex’ (chaotic) as it needs more and more excuses(or tyranny) and new battlefields to exploit those until the new lies have been exposed and replaced by newer bigger one.
(+ for the strategical Agenda Propagandist this is btw a welcome and wanted side effect,as mortal humans aren’t capable of understanding ‘complex stuff’ made up by divine experts)
Inside a humans head such a strategy may cause some massive cognitive dissonance.