Sill Getting Jabbed …

11:49 PM · Sep 29, 2022

10:57 PM · Sep 27, 2022

I was permanently banned from Twitter for posting a Pfizer study.

5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Daily Kos described this Pfizer document as a “Covid Conspiracy.”

CO2 Coalition’s Newest Member Tony Heller Just Got Kicked Off Twitter for Covid Conspiracies

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Sill Getting Jabbed …

  1. Torgo says:

    https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific–1811.pdf

    From Summer 2021, J Bart Classen had this data analyzed over a year ago and it’s disgraceful that Doctor Malhotra is so late to this knowledge.

  2. Petit_Barde says:

    mRNA vaccines send you more likely to the hospital (serious adverse event) than they reduce covid 19 hospitalization risk :

    “Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials” :

    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239

    “Results:
    Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively.

    Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9).

    The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).”

  3. arn says:

    Covid Conspiracy?

    It’s a correct term,as Pfizer,Fauci etc have conspired to push for and legalise an untestedvaccine and hide the data.
    There was a conspiracy to outlaw and ruin the reputation of a medicine like ivermectin.
    So the term,unlike climate denier,as noone denies the existence is correct – but used in a strange way and against the wrong people.

    Btw – why would have thought that taking experimental drugs would end badly.

    You don’t need to force people to take the good stuff just as you don’t need to force people to believe the truth.
    It’s only shitty things people are being forced into.

  4. rah says:

    She died. And criminals killed her. Institutional murder.
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fd_H1EjVsAAS3-c.jpg

  5. Disillusioned says:

    I wish the kind and brilliant minds over at the Daily Koz the very best. I support them obediently not questioning authority, and I do hope they continue to get all their booster shots.

  6. Dave N says:

    Anything from official sources that is damaging to the narrative they consider “out of context”, thus “disinformation”. It’s a completely pathetic joke.

    • misinformation is a propaganda term, so we deal with it the way we deal with bogus statistics or other tools of the propagandist: Who says so? Why does he/she say it? What do they stand to gain by saying it? What are they trying to hide? Where is the factual basis for the statement? These questions have particular relevance to ‘fact checkers’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.