UN 1991 : “we must eliminate 350,000 people per day”

“we must eliminate 350,000 people per day”

“We are going to suffocate because of carbon dioxide. it stimulates breathing, and we shall all end up panting to death if amounts of CO2 continue to increase.”

UNESCO Magazine November 1991

UNESCO Magazine November 1991

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to UN 1991 : “we must eliminate 350,000 people per day”

  1. rah says:

    Depopulation has been their goal for a very long time. the fewer, the easier to control.

    • arn says:

      It obviously is – and this article is one of the best examples.

      During the global warming infancy the Matrix of lies was not completely and overwhelmingly established.
      Therefore people could predict any catastrophic outcome as long as they blame white suprema… Co2.
      In this case someone did not get the message that Co2 kills the climate(his indoctrination about the coming ice age were still too strong, I guess) – therefore he went the suffocation road.
      While this Nonsense never really went mainstream (even a 200 fold Co2increase would probably not lead to suffocation or poisoning)
      it was showing the tendency to demonize Co2 until it can be branded a pollution.

      Co2 was essential for the UN as a pandemic was for WHO = and both got what they were looking for.

  2. arn says:

    I always wonder why it is only humans and a handful animals (for some strange reason only those that end up as our food)
    that are harming the planet somehow – but not a single one of the remaining million of species?

    It is also interesting how an atmospheric conversion from co2 to O2
    that took Cyanobacterias hundreds of millions of years can be reversed within a few decades by humans.

  3. Russell Cook says:

    Read a paragraph beyond the ludicrous bit about CO2 suffocation in the UNESCO Magazine, and they claim that the steadily increasing shell of busted orbiting satellite fragments encasing the Earth will eventually be so thick that no rocket will be able to get through into outer space without being destroyed by one of the busted bits, which, by the way, they say move “at the speed of a bullet.”

    That tells you pretty much all you need to know about the emotion-driven / anti-science illogical mentality these folks run on.

    • arn says:

      It is no piece of cake to hit the sweet spot so well so a satellite can orbit for a long time – tons of math,high tech,precision and engineering is necessary.

      But fragments , which usually have a very different vector/direction than their original satellite seem to stay forever in the orbit 🙂

  4. GeologyJim says:

    The environmental movement has always viewed mankind as “a cancer” whose existence
    is detrimental to all other more primitive life forms. It is a pathologically schizophrenic
    and suicidal belief system. Only very comfortable, privileged egotists can afford the
    luxury of wasting their time and our money by devising government controls over innate
    human ingenuity and the desire to freely expand human potential.

    Before the “ecology” movement of the 1960s started lambasting mankind for altering
    their environment (which all living things do), the eugenicists had marvelous designs for
    preserving the “purity” of the gene pool against interbreeding with “inferior” races. That’s why Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood are revered as saints by the likes of Woodrow Wilson, the Fabian’s, the early communists and all the other anti-humanist

    So FJB is employing “all of government” to squeeze off the supply and use of hydrocarbon fuels because that is the most certain means of reducing the population of
    “inferior types”

    The Devil is among us

  5. John Francis says:

    only God can directly save us from ourselves.
    but free will negates this possibility.
    notice the witch in first Lady position had Thanksgiving Declaration cleared of God.
    Michelle and Hilary likewise opposition to things of God.
    the national day of cursing the U.S. during President Trump’s time has not been prayed away.

  6. Disillusioned says:

    “A global commitment”

    For decades.

    UNESCO gladly published Cousteau’s double-talk. It supports the Agenda. All these eugenicists talk out of both sides of their mouths – about saving life in one sentence, just a few sentences separated from talk of eliminating life. This article, UNESCO, the UN IPCC goals, the language in Agenda 21 and 2030, the $billions from the Gates foundation for vaccines, the plans of the WEF, the WHO and and every decision these people have made before and since prove they are pursuing/playing the long-game for depopulation. And not coincidentally, a greater concentration of wealth and power.

    To do this, it is clear to me that they believe they must convince everyone they can reach, that the world is overpopulated. At one time I believed the nonsense. Because I had gotten only one side of the story – theirs.

  7. conrad ziefle says:

    So why are people told to breathe into a paper bag if they are panicking? At what levels does CO2 begin to stimulate over breathing? Does it stimulate it when the presence of O2 is adequate? I don’t know all of this biology stuff, but I vaguely remember being told that when you hold your breath and begin to start to feel the extreme need to breath, it is because of the build up of CO2 in your system, I assume blood or lungs, and not because your O2 is low. So how high is that CO2 when that starts to happen? I’m betting it is more than 1% maybe more than 10%, neither of which is anywhere close to what we are experiencing in the ambient air supply. And somehow prehistoric animals, including mammals, were able to negotiate substantially higher levels of CO2 than we have now. Where does the UN get their scientists, Third World voodoo doctors?

    • Jack the Insider says:

      From the Australian Mines Rescue Handbook
      At 0.5 % (5,000 ppm) respiration increases by 5%
      At 2.0 % (20,000 ppm) respiration increases by 50%
      At 3.0 % (30,000 ppm) respiration increases by 100%
      At 5.0 % (50,000 ppm) respiration increases by 300%
      Over 5.0% may cause death.

      You can roughly assume that oxygen will be displaced by the proportionate amount that CO2 increases starting with 20.93%. So at 5.0% CO2 you can assume that O2 will be down to around 15.9%.

      Note that if Oxygen is displaced by something inert like more Nitrogen then at 15.9% O2 life is still sustainable. O2 has to get down to below 12% for death to be likely.

  8. Gamecock says:

    ‘350,000 people per day’

    Not much ahead of actual population growth. They need to get more serious about how many people they need to murder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *