“A highly regarded factcheck team says”

“Realclimatescience.com  A badly-designed website citing widely discredited scientists, and publishing fart stories”

1:02 AM · Dec 7, 2023

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to “A highly regarded factcheck team says”

  1. rah says:

    “Highly regarded” by whom? Certainly not so by anyone that can come up with the sum of 4 by adding 2 + 2!

    Anyway, keep up the good work Tony. I see this as strong evidence your right over the target.

    • Non-attributed ‘fact checker’ endorsed by non-attributed authority. I am impressed, it must be reliable. Just how stupid do these buffoons think the general public is? They may not follow the scientific argument as to why AGW is garbage, but decades of exposure to the advertising industry has equipped them with the skills to recognize BS when they see it.

  2. Mango Thonotosassa says:

    “Fact Checkers” are paid liars. They don’t even qualify as media whores.

    • arn says:

      Fact Checkers are what Mafia judges are for the Mafia or the Warren Commission for the JFK shooting or the ICC for the war mongering countries that created and pay for the Hague Court.

      And climate science is at the very core of this nonsense.
      After Climate Gate they investigated themselves and found themselves innocent.

      When people are too dumb for science they become climate scientists,
      and those who are even too dumb for journalism become fact checkers.

  3. Timo, not that one! says:

    Your problem,Tony, is that you use data from actual government sources to debunk the Warmunists.

    You better straighten up, before it’s too late.

  4. The ‘fact checkers’ present derogatory statements without one iota of supporting evidence. That is because they have no actual arguments, so are reduced to mud slinging. Sensible people want evidence, ergo the pronouncements of ‘fact checkers’ are intended for idiots.

  5. arn says:

    The really strange thing is that,
    whenever I post a comment on youtube and mention the realclimatescience website the comment gets instantly deleted(even when I mention the alternative website),
    despite the fact that I always recommend only official mainstream expert sources(to click the 1970 cooling scare in the black banner).

    There should be no reason to ban a website that destroys itself.

    But I guess the 1970s articles about climate, promoted by the same guys who later started the warming scam, are right conspiracy pseudo science ,that turned from right to left once the scam switched to warming.

  6. Russell Cook says:

    (/Sarc: on) The ?p???? guy and his highly regarded factcheck team had me at “Minimal traffic.” Now I have the perfect excuse to bail out of my daily readings of Tony’s latest blog posts. (/sarc: off)

  7. Mac says:

    Oh, my God! I love it! “Another of my leftist junk science shamanism websites rates Real Climate Science as unreliable”. There’s a surprise. So, let me get this straight: how is the posting of thousands of actual articles and papers “conspiracy pseudoscience”? I’m old enough to remember the 1970s, when, every day, we were bombarded with warnings about a new ice age, and how it was all mankind’s fault. It wasn’t one or two articles. It was hundreds and hundreds of articles and newscasts. These climate change people are religious nutjobs, they hate mankind, and they have no idea what has been done to them.

    • conrad ziefle says:

      Well it’s simple. All of that information is unreliable, because NOAA and other governmental agencies have deleted the data which shows it to be correct. I hope someone, somewhere, has saved all of that data.
      Yes, members of the Marxist religious cult are fanatics. It is so much easier to be the faithful rather than the intelligent.

  8. Disillusioned says:

    ‘A highly retarded factcheck team says’

    Just had to fix the major spelling error.

  9. conrad ziefle says:

    Interesting what arn says about being censored when he mentions this website. It’s pretty clear who does the censoring and who is open for debate. However, I’m sorry, I don’t get any real information from either of these Xpletive posts. Tom Nelson podcast?? what?? Who?? So what?? Highly deceptive Marxist propagandist team, working out of whose basement??
    The only thing I got is that the traffic here is way less than it should be and needs to be. And I don’t care if a million people come here every day; it still needs to be more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *