On March 20, 1907 California was flooded and it was 102 degrees in Oklahoma.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
If you look at the following data which goes back to 1850, there seems to be a strong increase of ocean and land temperature in the last 40 years, starting in the 1980s compared to all the data since 1850. The question is of course: Is the data reliable? Assuming it is, then there has been a strong increase in world temperature since 1980 with no end in sight… I would like to hear your opinion. Thank you from Bavaria!
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/land/3/7/1850-2023
What would cause you to assume that NOAA data are reliable?
Yes, exactly how can I verify that the data is correct? Do you have reliable information that their data is incorrect?
Are you new here? You are at the source right now. Do some digging.