Settled Science

At 5:42 PM, the Green District Councillor in Essex said “CO2 is the main driver of global warming.”  At 6:29 PM he said “Ice ages are driven by the MK Mechanism. CO2 responds to that and acts as an amplifier.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Settled Science

  1. Petit_Barde says:

    As an engineer, I never noticed any such kind of amplifier in any science field I studied, be it thermodynamics, physics, chemistry, quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, radiative heat transfer, electronics, …, without energy being supplied at some point in the process.

    Perhaps James Abbott should explain his point and he may win a Nobel prize for his discovery of the perpetual motion (or infinite energy from nowhere).

    • arn says:

      I wonder why the Amplifier does not work on Mars,
      nor did never ever work on earth so far .

      Imagine the amplifying power of 5000 ppm co 2.
      Or the amplifying power of a planet covered with H2O – but thanks god there is no such planet.
      The sun would look like a cold cold place compared to it.

      But he is right with the Punk stuff considering what Punk really means.
      And lets be hoenest – this dude would be running around and crying about the blue cloud of steam that will kill us all if Paul Ehrlichs scenario would have been chosen as the big thing to fear globally instead of global warming.

    • From the literature, it is evident that many astronomers and astrophysicists consider the laws of thermodynamics to be optional. The CO2 theory appears to claim that power can be generated from nothing, which is the fundamental reason it is utter nonsense.

    • dm says:

      An internet search of “MK Mechanism” + climateMK ” yielded NO results relevant to climate change on the first 3 pages. Perhaps that is why Petit_Barde NEVER noticed any such kind of amplifier in any science field.

      The most numerous search result was: MK “… is a key enzyme … which produces the biosynthetic precursors for steroids …”. Perhaps Mr. Abbott can win a Nobel Prize by explaining the link between enzymes and climate dynamics.

  2. conrad ziefle says:

    I’m right, and you should know it, whaaaaaa!!!! If you don’t believe in the things I believe in then you aren’t an expert. Whaaaa!!! Abbott the astrologer is clinging desperately to his religious beliefs. So, in his mind, CO2 has some kind of a binary switch and responds to certain mechanisms in a selective way. Did he get his class on semiconductors mixed up with his chemistry class?

  3. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    I’m amused you got him to say CO2 causes global warming AND that CO2 causes global cooling in less than a single hour.

  4. Mac says:

    I’ve noticed that these climate cultists never respond with civility whenever their little cult scam is challenged with honest questions or reasonable skepticism. It’s always the same thing: rage, name-calling, threats, and insane unhinged behavior. I studied science as an undergraduate and a graduate student. I don’t ever recall one situation where I became angry and unhinged when another science student challenged anything I said or claimed. I responded by offering evidence and stayed calm. Nor do I recall any of my friends whom I studied with reacting with angry name-calling and lunatic behavior. It was always a debate and an exchanging of information and views, not an accusation of heresy and a subsequent witch trial. It may have gotten a little heated at times, but I do not recall ever having been called names, belittled, or threatened. That was years ago, though, before science was corrupted by leftist activism.

    Climate change is total unscientific nonsense, and it’s nothing but a radical left religious cult masquerading as science.

  5. thurmanzhou says:

    I saw a perpetual motion on you tube! Soda bottles half filled and attached to a bicycle rim! It really works! It generates lots of money for the YT video! Ever body knows the Bode formula in electronics is true. All you have to do is add energy, just like the perpetual motion device. Oh, that’s how they derived the 303 K when co2 reached 50% above pre industrial levels. ( about 30 C for a world temp instead of either 15 or 16 C as it is now co2 at 50%. )

  6. Peteo says:

    Wait … what?! I thought climate change can only be driven by CO2? Well, that’s easy. Ice age cycles must not be acts of climate change. There, science is settled.

    • DD More says:

      Reasoning from Algor & his magical Temperature / CO2 Chart

      There is no mechanism defined that explains how or why low CO2 would lead temperatures to pull the globe out of an ice age.
      There is no mechanism defined to explain how or why high levels of CO2 would trigger an ice age.
      For any cause and effect relationship, the cause MUST lead the effect. CO2 does not lead Temperature, it follows it by 800 to 1,500 years. The AGW Theory is similar to claiming that lung cancer causes smoking.

      Abbot’s MK Mechanism is the same as Lung Cancer causing Smoking.

  7. czechlist says:

    “Reasons advanced for the extraordinary unscientific behaviour of hundreds of scientists, include tunnel-vision, groupthink, herd-like behaviour, persistent bullying by senior scientists, personal jealousies, empire building, loyalty to colleagues and institutions, arrogance, vicious pettiness ignorance, lack of moral courage, a visceral reluctance of some very senior scientists to acknowledge they were wrong.”
    Richard Mackey

    • arn says:

      The worst mistake humanity ever made is to assume that
      people with a degree are more fair, more objective and more hoenest than the rest of us.

      Quiet the opposite is true , because they are way more skilled to mask their failures and sometimes even sell their negative attitudes as virtue.
      And they are also way more skilled to find excuses and create an environment that does not hold them accountable.

    • Fred Harwood says:

      I remember well that fundamental shift, back in the 1960s.

    • Petit_Barde says:

      I agree, but I would add that in the continental drift case, which was essentially an academics controversy, there were no such a collusion of vested interests (phony Malthusians, nostalgic Marxists, fraudsters and corrupt crony capitalists, corrupt media and institutions) in a massive and fraudulent money grab asssorted with a totalitarian population control as is the case with the climate madness, which is therefore much more concerning and will certainly not be successfully fought in the scientific field alone.

  8. I believe the claim is that at low concentrations carbon dioxide has a disproportionate effect on the temperature. This is the similar reasoning to that which claims CO2 cannot cause much change in temperature because its effect is saturated at its current value. It is the greenhouse effect itself which is arrant nonsense, but is as deeply ingrained in the foklore as phlogiston, or canals on Mars once were.

    • Disillusioned says:

      If only it were the arrant nonsense with which we had to contend. There is an active and coordinated deception keeping it alive, as documented by megalomaniacs’ own words and their intent to rule the world – to use the flawed hypothesis to accomplish their evil goals. The anthropogenic web is continuously being spun – exponentially as compared to, for example, the Piltdown Man fraud or other deceptions – with a much greater coordination and deeper pockets financing the 24/7 spinning wheel.

  9. Disillusioned says:

    Q. And, who the _______ is James Abbott anyway?
    A. Just one more Dunning-Kruger useful idiot.

    The spinning wheel has created many.

  10. conrad ziefle says:

    Anything that CO2 can do, H2O does better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *