“created for public confusion”

Senator Inhofe was the most vocal person in the US Senate fighting against the climate scam.  Even after his death, he is still exposing the incompetence of this cult.

This is the desmog article John Mashey linked to.

“On January 21, Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) again displayed the same deception/incompetence that pervaded his book, The Greatest Hoax (2012).

In this video segment (3:00-5:20), he presented a poster on the Senate floor that matches the image below from “Kyoto by Degrees,” an anonymous Wall Street Journal (WSJ) Opinion piece, June 21, 2005.

Both contained claims plausibly called academic or journalistic deception (or even fraud), created for public confusion.

MedievalDeception 2015: Inhofe Drags Senate Back To Dark Ages – DeSmog

The image is from the 1990 IPCC report, not John Daly or an “anonymous Wall Street Journal (WSJ) Opinion piece, June 21, 2005.”


About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to “created for public confusion”

  1. Bob G says:

    the left can’t let a good man pass without what they view is a cheap shot. Imhoff wasn’t a climate denier. he was a BS detector and they hated him for it. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/ghouls-multiple-liberal-media-outlets-report-death-senator/

    • arn says:

      “This guy died but he deserved it because he did not believe in climate change”

      Is the headline that perfectly sums the degenerated and totalitarian mentality
      of the left and their real inclusivity,tolerance and diverse thought
      – and this pattern can be observed on any new crazyness they are forcing onto people to divide them.

      Politicos most hoenest moment.

  2. It is easy to recognize a climate charlatan, they use the propagandist smear ‘denier’. They are not scientists, they are frauds. Legitimate science does not rely entirely on calumnies and censorship, but on facts and logic, I see very little of either in the climate hysteria.

  3. Michael L Dee says:

    Dealing with a gnostic religion.

    Or perhaps ideological possession.

    You will never get these people even consider evidence that is contrary to their gnostic-religious/ideological narrative.

    I suppose the Left also denies the archeology and historical records that corroborate the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warming.

    How DID those Viking artifacts get there when Greenland was ALWAYS covered with ice?

  4. Bill says:

    What is the source for graph 7.1c on page 202, which shows the Little Ice Age? I’ve heard climate “fact-checkers” say that this graphic is “sketched” based on temperature measurements from one tiny county in England. The discussion in the article would seem to disprove that.

    Anyway, thanks Tony for bringing us original source material! the best antidote to craziness and propaganda.

    • Conrad Ziefle says:

      The simple answer to your question, filled with pages of details, is to read Fagan’s book “The Little Ice Age”. While actual thermometer data may be in short supply, there are written accounts from all over Europe, and there are other proxies for actual temperature readings available, including evidence that it was worldwide. Those who make those claims about lack of information, are not very good scientists, if scientists at all. They are fanatics who no longer are capable of analyzing facts.

  5. Margaret Smith says:

    I bought his book. He was really on the ball. I was very sad to hear of his passing. However he reached a good age and was well respected. R.I.P. Jim.

  6. Scott Allen says:

    Desmog is just a Canadian public relations firm. Last time I checked they had no climate scientists and only had journalism majors.

    The thing about climate alarmist is they lie and people who lie have to remember all the lies they have told and try to keep,them all straight or their narrative falls apart.
    The wheels on the climate scam are coming off, as more information comes outThe desmog article is an example.They forgot about what the IPPC reported before.

    • Disillusioned says:


      I don’t believe the Left have to remember what they said. They don’t seem to care if you catch them in lies and contradictions. If you call them out, they will ignore/censor/block/cancel/ridicule their detractors as they continue like a steamroller pushing the doomsday message du jour. Whether it contradicts something they said before, so be it. The strategy is simple – to drown you out as they flood the earth with their repeating message, details be damned (and inconsequential).

      Scott, you are much like Gordon and Conrad – two contributors among the many I respect on this little corner of the Internet. You all can somehow see (or imagine) what I cannot – that “the wheels on the climate scam are coming off.”

      If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.
      – Joseph Goebbels

      As far as I can tell, the climate scamsters are maintaining the Big Lie (with all its warts), because they have the State on their side, the money and the largest megaphone on the planet all in their corner.

      But I love your optimism. (As I have also said to both Gordon and Conrad.)

      • scott allen says:

        thank you for the nice comments.

        as to the lie they keep repeating, one person has changed the directions and help to expose those lies.

        Elon Musk who bought X/Twitter

        before Musk, people like Tony and others were repeatly banned or viewships reduced.
        After Musk, views and engagements are up for the truth and questioning of the Science has shown the holes and way down for the ‘climate alarmist’ who repeat lies or misinform the public and more and more people are seeing the scam of global warming and the science is not settled
        the alarmist have to resort to blocking on X, one person at Berekely Earth did the research on taffic patterns for the top 100 climate scientist and found followers and interactions dropped to half of what they were before (meaning it was fake/astroturfing). They tried to start their own brand of Twitter call
        The have big government and big money (solar/wind/china) on their side

    • Tel says:

      Even their very name is a lie … because CO2 has nothing to do with smog.

      Smog consists of visible particles, whereas CO2 is a invisible gas. Smog actually has a small cooling effect on the surface.

  7. Laurie says:

    Figures – more lies – they are scheming with the father of lies.

  8. Russell Cook says:

    There’s ALWAYS more to these situations — with regard to Tony’s mention of “desmog .. John Mashey,” Mashey is NOT just someone with a small association at the Desmog organization:

    • First, to set this up, Desmog’s current shortened name essentially buries an inconvenient truth about their original longer name, as I detailed in this WUWT comment https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/06/06/desmog-climate-denier-nigel-farage-took-money-from-big-oil-to-promote-cheaper-energy/#comment-3922054 . They are a propaganda site, pure and simple.
    • I have a tag category at my own blog for Mashey http://gelbspanfiles.com/?tag=john-mashey , he is enslaved to provably false accusations about industry-paid sketch climate scientists. http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Mashey-desmog-Gelb.jpg
    • Mashey said outright that Naomi Oreskes was the person who introduced him to Desmogblog administrators. http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Mashey-Oreskes-Desmog-intro.jpg
    • Mashey and Desmogblog co-founder James Hoggan were among the participants at Oreskes’ notorious La Jolla CA workshop which explored ways to create “ExxonKnew” lawsuits. http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/La-Jolla-participants.jpg
    • Back in 2012, Mashey basically confessed that he’d fed Desmogblog info to the PBS Frontline Climate of Doubt program. http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Mashey-Frontline.jpg
    • In 2002, Dr Stephen Schneider put on a presentation disputing Bjørn Lomborg’s book, “The Skeptical Environmentalist. Mashey admits to being essentially invited to be the “AGW skeptic” at Schneider’s presentation. http://web.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Comments/020109.html / http://gelbspanfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Mashey-Schneider-Lomborg.jpg

    When a person like that starts out in their AGW career disingenuously, well, …. we can only imagine how the anti-intellectual hole they dig for themselves ultimately grows to the size of an open pit mine.

  9. GW says:

    I knew he retired (sadly) some years ago, but I didn’t know he’d passed. Very sad. RIP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *